MONARK Trial: LPV-RTV vs LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Naive Patients

lpv rtv versus lpv rtv zdv 3tc in treatment n.w
1 / 6
Embed
Share

A comparison of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir combined with zidovudine-lamivudine in treatment-naive HIV patients showed lower rates of virological suppression in the monotherapy group. The study design, treatment arms, results at week 48, and tolerance of study medications are discussed. Based on the results, lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy is not recommended as a preferred treatment option in antiretroviral-naive patients. Source: Delfraissy JF et al. AIDS. 2008;22:385-93.

  • HIV
  • MONARK Trial
  • LPV-RTV
  • ZDV-3TC
  • Treatment

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Nave MONARK Trial

  2. LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Nave MONARK: Study Design Study Design: MONARK Background: Randomized, pilot, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of lopinavir- ritonavir monotherapy with lopinavir-ritonavir in combination with zidovudine-lamivudine in treatment- na ve patients with HIV infection LPV/r 400/100 mg BID (n=83) Inclusion Criteria (n = 136) - Age >18 - Antiretroviral-na ve - HIV RNA <100,000 copies/mL - CD4 count>100 cells/mm3 - Exclusions for certain protease or NRTI mutations LPV/r 400/100 mg BID + ZDV-3TC (n =53) Treatment Arms - Lopinavir-ritonavir 400-100 mg BID - Lopinavir-ritonavir 400-100 mg BID + ZDV-3TC 150-300mg BID MONARK = MONotherapy AntiRetroviral Kaletra Source: Delfraissy JF, et al. AIDS. 2008;22:385-93.

  3. LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Nave MONARK: Results Week 48: Virologic Response (ITT, Missing=Failure) Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy Lopinavir-ritonavir + ZDV-3TC 100 HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (%) 80 75 64 60 40 20 0 Source: Delfraissy JF, et al. AIDS. 2008;22:385-93.

  4. LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Nave MONARK: Results Tolerance of study medications LPV-RTV Monotherapy (n = 83) LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC (n = 53) Adverse event or Laboratory Abnormality Diarrhea 6% 8% AST and/or ALT elevation 12% 8% Serious adverse event 12% 8% Discontinuations 16% 23% Source: Delfraissy JF, et al. AIDS. 2008;22:385-93.

  5. LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Nave MONARK: Conclusion Conclusion: Our results suggest that lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy demonstrates lower rates of virological suppression when compared with lopinavir/ritonavir triple therapy and therefore should not be considered as a preferred treatment option for widespread use in antiretroviral-naive patients. Source: Delfraissy JF, et al. AIDS. 2008;22:385-93.

  6. Acknowledgment The National HIV Curriculum is an AIDS Education and Training Center (AETC) Program resource funded by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration. The project is led by the University of Washington and the AETC National Coordinating Resource Center. The content in this slide set does not represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources & Services Administration.

Related


More Related Content