Navigating Research Policies for Open Access Success
Explore the complexities of research policies in the context of open access, covering issues such as conflicting policies, institutional responses, and the importance of incentives. Discover the motivations behind policies set by publishers, institutions, funders, and governments, aiming to enhance access to research and drive cultural change within the academic community.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Getting the Rights Right - or, When Policies Collide! Bill Hubbard Director, Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham UKSG Webinar 19th May 2015
Overview Open Access The policy environment Getting a clear perspective on policies Dealing with policy detail and clashes A strategic institutional response Strategy and tactics for getting action
Open Access Budapest Declaration ... the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all ... Implications . . . CC-BY to CC-BY-NC-ND What re-use? Commercial? Cure for cancer? Text-mining - data-mining? Data?
What policies exist? Publisher policies Institutional policies Funder policies REF policies REF is principle mechanism for determining research funding Government policy Finch Committee
Why have policies? - Open Access Without policies in favour, Open Access adoption hovered at ~15% Overwhelming majority of researchers in favour of OA concept Uptake throttled by set working habits, esteem indicators, reward mechanisms Cultural change requires strong incentives Money, esteem
Why have policies? For control To support paths for development Understanding background and motivation can be key for an effective response For the explicit motivations, ask the policy bodies themselves: the following is my own interpretation . . .
Why have policies? - Publishers Driven by perception of commercial need Faced with uncertainty, human reaction is to freeze the status quo Controls environment while a sustainable path is worked out depending on view, controls might read restricts; sustainable might read profitable Permissions or Restrictions
Why have policies? - Government Strategic steer, given trends in access to information, transparency Improved value and returns for public investment Greater exposure of UK research leading to investment Improved research environment
Why have policies? - REF Following lead from Government in shaping future of research communications Reducing administrative overhead in REF although it might not seem like it right now! Improves records and clarity in national research picture Alignment with RCUK and others
Why have policies? - Funders Improved return on public investment More transparent use of public money Improved research environment where more research is shared more widely and more quickly Professional and ethical drivers
Why have policies? - Institutions Positions institution in line with information trends on openness and re-use Greater exposure for institutional research Greater engagement with research users and investors Improved admin, record keeping and picture of institutional research Aligns with REF and Funder policies
What drives compliance? Professional ethics Social morality Fear of consequences personal institutional Can you prioritise by examining compliance drivers for each policy - what are the consequences?
Dealing with policies What should be tackled first? Achieving recognition of the need for compliance in-house Efficient support structures and processes Who deals with compliance?
Researchers view from the past. . . RCUK Publisher Other Funder Researcher Funding Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher Other Funder Researcher Funding Institutional Repository Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher Other Funder Mandate Researcher Funding Institutional Repository Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institutional Database Institution
Researchers view . . . RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institutional Database Institution Institutional OA Fund
Researchers view . . . REF RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institutional Database Institution Institutional OA Fund
Researchers view . . . REF RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institutional Database Institution Institutional OA Fund
Researchers view . . . REF RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institutional Database Institution Institutional OA Fund
Researchers view . . . REF RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institutional Database Institution Institutional OA Fund
Researchers view from the past. . . RCUK Publisher Other Funder Researcher Funding Institution
Researchers view . . . REF RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding ? Institutional Repository Mandate Institutional Database Institution Institutional OA Fund
and soon, with added research data?! REF RCUK RCUK Publisher with OA Option Other Funder Mandate ? Publisher with OA Option Open Access Publisher Other Funder Mandate ? Open Access Publisher Researcher Central/subject Repository Funding Researcher Central/subject Repository Institutional Repository Funding ? Mandate ? Institutional Repository Institutional Database Mandate Institution Institutional OA Fund Institutional Database Institution Institutional OA Fund
Is there a key? Publishers need author compliance to publish Publishers need institutional compliance or could take legal action Institutions need compliance or, ummm ... RCUK wants ~ 60% compliance, rising REF needs 100% compliance in 101/2 months
Priorities and Precedence We tend to see the publisher policy as being the source for rights in an article - the thing that defines what else can be complied with exemptions (REF) levels of compliance (RCUK) where possible get-outs (institutions) Why? This is back to front!
Research cycle Library Services IT Services institutions Software suppliers researchers Equipment suppliers funders Research Office Publishers
Is there a key? #2 Publisher policies should respond to the research agenda and not act in opposition! First decide what the institution needs to comply with, within the research cycle Respond to the public investment you have been entrusted with Then see if publisher policies comply with your requirements
Is there a key? #3 Deal with REF Deal with RCUK and others Ok for REF, ok for most funders (some specific deposit venues and embargoes) lower levels of compliance required in 2016 Deal with institutional policies
Is there a key? #4 Does not take away publisher restrictions, but puts them in context Now time to address publication choice previous advocacy avoided this HEFCE wants to see an institutional process to inform academics of publication choices with exemptions by exception not business as usual + exemptions
Open Access and the REF To be eligible - Deposited at the point of acceptance Metadata immediately available Full-text available after 12 or 24 months Institutional process to handle exemptions Applies from April 2016 In-house systems, processes, workflows: ready in 101/2 months!
Institutional strategy Prepare for an OA future Comply with REF, RCUK and other funders Address academic issues of choice of publication by opening debate Examine place of journal brands in rewards Ensure institutional policies in place and reflect policies of REF and Funders Ensure support structures in place
Internal strategy for change Use the REF to gain traction for change Engage senior levels of management in seeing the need for compliance Engage senior academics in asking for support with REF process Use the REF coordinators to push for coordination, who know what it is like
Summary Build institutional response around prioritised policy compliance Open Access is the rule, with exceptions All institutional stakeholders on top of OA as an idea; as a process; as a work-flow; as requirements; as developing policies Researchers need to know what to do - clear, concise, contextualised
There are issues - BUT ! Open Access is a real benefit for researchers, the research process, institutions, funders, tax-payers, the public and for our culture and our future Support and belief from all of the stakeholders in the research process All of the issues can be resolved
Bill Hubbard Director, Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham bill.hubbard@nottingham.ac.uk sherpa.ac.uk/romeo sherpa.ac.uk/juliet sherpa.ac.uk/fact sherpa.ac.uk/opendoar
