Ohio Department of Youth Services Fidelity Monitoring Report 2012-2017
Explore the outcomes of fidelity monitoring in Ohio Department of Youth Services from 2012 to 2017, focusing on MST and Wraparound programs. Discover the impact on youth living at home, engagement in school/work, arrest rates, team observations, and fidelity scores.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Relating Fidelity Monitoring to MST and Wraparound Outcomes: 2012 through 2017 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES JANE TIMMONS-MITCHELL, PH. D. BEGUN CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION JACK, JOSEPH AND MORTON MANDEL SCHOOL OF APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCES CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY APRIL 20, 2018
Targeted Reclaim Sites since 2012 MST Counties and sites Cuyahoga, Lorain County: Applewood, Applewood PSB Wraparound Counties and Sites Lucas County: Family and Children First Council Franklin County: Nationwide Children s Hospital, Buckeye Ranch, Rosemont Center Mahoning County: Family and Children First Council, Juvenile Court Lucas County: Zepf Center Trumbull County: Mental Health Board and Juvenile Court Medina County: CIC Stark, CIC Stark PSB
MST Fidelity and Outcomes Fidelity Overall Adherence Score (cut off = +0.61) Per cent of youth with Adherence measured 0.686 93.59% Outcomes Percent of youth living at Home (Target: 90%) 86.13% Percent of youth in School/Working (Target: 90%) 81.46% Percent of youth with No New Arrests (Target: 90%) 79.60%
Wraparound Fidelity Team Observation Measure 92 Percent Fidelity on the TOM: Targeted Reclaim and National Mean 91 90 88 86 85 84 82 Percent Fidelity Targeted Reclaim National Mean Number of youth assessed 43 Percent Fidelity 91 85 Targeted Reclaim National Mean
Wraparound Fidelity WFI-EZ Percent Fidelity by Domain: Targeted Reclaim and National Mean 90.00% 81.10% 79.20% 77.60% 77.30% 75.30% 73.80% 80.00% 72.50% 71.30% 67.80% 65.60% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Targeted Reclaim National Mean Effective teamwork Natural/Community Supports Needs-based Outcomes-Based Strength-and- family-driven Targeted Reclaim 71.3% 72.5% 79.2% 77.3% 81.1% National Mean 67.8% 65.6% 73.8% 75.3% 77.6%
Wraparound Outcomes Chart Title 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% yes no Placement ER Treatment Police contact Suspended/expelled Yes No National Mean 21% D1. Since starting wraparound, my child or youth has had a new placement in an institution (such as detention, psychiatric hospital, treatment center, or group home) 36.4% 63.6% 13% D2. Since starting wraparound, my child or youth has been treated in an Emergency Room due to a mental health problem D3. Since starting wraparound, my child or youth has had a negative contact with police 18.2% 81.8% 25.5% 74.5% 21% D4. Since starting wraparound, my child or youth has been suspended or expelled from school 27.3% 72.7% 24%
Conclusions MST Wraparound Fidelity established for the 6 years reported Fidelity established for the 6 years reported Outcomes: Outcomes: At home 86% Not in placement 64% In school/working 81% Not suspended/expelled 73% No new arrests 80% Not in contact with police 75%
![Importance of Rock v. MWB [2018] UKSC 24 as Explained by Lord Sumption](/thumb/193348/importance-of-rock-v-mwb-2018-uksc-24-as-explained-by-lord-sumption.jpg)
