Optimizing Voting Precincts for Efficiency and Accessibility

merging voting precincts n.w
1 / 7
Embed
Share

Explore the benefits and considerations of merging voting precincts, including increased early voting opportunities, cost savings, and staffing challenges. Learn about the requirements set by the NCSBE and lessons learned from previous precinct changes for a smoother transition.

  • Voting precincts
  • Election efficiency
  • NCSBE requirements
  • Accessibility
  • Cost savings

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MERGING VOTING PRECINCTS Randolph County BOE Rockingham County BOE

  2. WHY MERGE VOTING PRECINCTS? * Increase in early voting * Polling places issues - ADA compliance, difficulty in finding appropriate spaces * Small precincts * Limited resources hard to find enough poll workers * Cost savings when purchasing new voting equipment * County Board of Elections support

  3. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS * Post-election reporting of ballots by VTD * Political makeup and climate of County * Desire of County Board of Elections bipartisan support * Census (2010/2020) * Timing gradual or all at once * New, larger polling places with adequate staffing * No VTDs when Rockingham first merged precincts

  4. NCSBE REQUIREMENTS * Resolution approved and signed by County Board of Elections * Executive Summary explaining changes * Polling place accessibility surveys * Written descriptions of proposed precinct boundary lines * Electronic map and images of existing and proposed precincts and polling places * Voter notification plan * Must code ballots by Voting Tabulation Districts and record votes by VTD (G.S. 163-132.3) * Update SEIMS precinct code names and description names in accordance with G.S. 163-132.3A * Update polling place pictures in SEIMS * Rockingham County a preclearance county

  5. AFTER PRECINCT CHANGES 2012: 40 Precincts 2013: 22 Precincts

  6. LESSONS LEARNED Positive Changes Issues to Resolve Long lines in November 2014 lengthy ballot, no straight ticket vote, local issues Easier to merge near census when Precincts match VTDs Public perception: negative public feedback was limited Expect the unexpected Not a one-size-fits-all solution Coding by precinct costs are higher Post-election reporting by VTD is done. Reallocated resources open additional one-stops when needed Fewer judges/chief judges needed Made changes during a municipal election year, not before a presidential Got buy-in from County Commissioners and political parties Long-term cost savings on voting equipment, laptops Times savings before and after election

  7. Randolph County Melissa Johnson Rockingham County Tina Cardwell

More Related Content