Oregon Educator Evaluation System Overview
This overview covers the purpose and vision of Oregon's Educator Evaluation and Support System, detailing the required elements, standards of professional practice, differentiated performance levels, and the alignment of evaluation with professional growth. It emphasizes improving instructional practices, engaging educators in the evaluation process, promoting collaboration, and enhancing student growth. The framework includes standards for professional practice, multiple measures, and a cycle of evaluation and professional growth. Differentiated performance levels assess educators based on meeting standards at varying levels. The system aims to elevate teaching and learning through continuous improvement and alignment between evaluation and professional development.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics Oregon Department of Education 1
Agenda Purpose and Vision of Evaluation Systems Oregon Framework 5 Required Elements Standards of Professional Practice Differentiated Performance Levels Multiple Measures Evaluation & Professional Growth Cycle Aligned Professional Learning Resources Oregon Department of Education 2
Purpose of an Evaluation System Improve instructional, professional and leadership practices Engage every educator as an active participant in their evaluation Ensure the process promotes collaboration and continuous learning Improve student growth and prepare students for College, Careers and Citizenship Oregon Department of Education 3
A transformative professional growth system: Shifts from making contract renewal decisions to elevating leading, teaching and learning Vision and Principles of a Quality System Nurturesa culture of continuous improvement and growth by including formative assessment and support Creates alignment between evaluation and professional learning that adds value to the system Oregon Department of Education 4
Oregon Framework Required Elements Elements must be included in all teacher and administrator evaluation and support systems: 1. Standards of Professional Practice 2. Differentiated Performance Levels (4) 3. Multiple Measures 4. Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle 5. Aligned Professional Learning Systems must align to the Oregon Framework requirements, but there is flexibility in local design Oregon Department of Education 5
Standards of Professional Practice Model Core Teaching Standards Educational Leadership Standards Four Domains (10 Standards) 1. The Learner and Learning 2. Content 3. Instructional Practice 4. Professional Responsibility Six Domains 1. Visionary Leadership 2. Instructional Improvement 3. Effective Management 4. Inclusive Practice 5. Ethical Leadership 6. Socio-Political Context Oregon Department of Education 6
Differentiated Performance Levels Performance evaluated on the Standards of Professional Practice on 4 levels Level 1 Does not meet standards Level 2 Making progress toward standards Level 3 Meets standards (Proficient) Level 4 Exceeds standards Oregon Department of Education 7
Multiple Measures Professional Practice Student Learning & Growth Professional Responsibility Oregon Department of Education 8
Student Learning and Growth (SLG) Goals SLG goal setting is a collaborative process Teachers and administrators collaborate with supervisors/evaluators to establish at least two student learning and growth goals Discuss rigor and rationale of each goal, research-based strategies, professional learning needed to support goal attainment Meet and discuss progress mid-year and at end of year Reflect on results and determine implications for professional growth path and summative evaluation Oregon Department of Education 9
Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle Self- Reflection Summative Evaluation Goal Setting Observation & Evidence Collection Observation & Evidence Collection Formative Assessment Oregon Department of Education 10
Factors in Summative Effectiveness Rating Professional Responsibility Professional Practice Student Learning & Growth Summative Effectiveness Rating Oregon Department of Education 11
Evaluation aligned with high quality professional development opportunities Relevant to educator s goals and needs Aligned Professional Learning Informs decisions for professional growth Oregon Department of Education 12
Resources Check out the Educator Effectiveness Toolkit! Oregon Framework SLG Guidance Sample SLG Goals Resources from Districts Oregon Department of Education 13
