Overview of LCP BREF Revision and Implementation Timeline

bref velk spalovac za zen n.w
1 / 15
Embed
Share

This document provides detailed information on the revision process and current status of the Large Combustion Plant (LCP) Best Available Techniques Reference Document (BREF). It includes discussions on the prioritized issues related to emission levels, applicability of technologies, and compliance requirements. The timeline for implementing revisions according to the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) and the implications for new and existing plants are also outlined.

  • Revision process
  • LCP BREF
  • Emission levels
  • Compliance requirements
  • Implementation timeline

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BREF VELK SPALOVAC ZAZEN (PR B H REVIZE A AKTU LN STAV) XVII. F RUM PRO V M NU INFORMAC O BAT MPO, 24.11.2016 Pavel Frolka EZ, a. s.

  2. OBSAH Informace o projedn v n revize LCP BREF Aktu ln stav n vrhu, vybran BAT-AELs Dal postup 1

  3. REVIZE LCP BREF DOSAVADN V VOJ St vaj c LCP BREF z 07/2006 Dotazn kov et en (2012) 580 dotazn k (8 za zen za R) D1 1.n vrh BREF (06/2013) P ipom nky k D1 8500 p ipom nek; 167 za R, v echny v souladu s IED (09/2013) esk iniciativa Dom c paliva Zohledn n podm nek specifick ch n rodn ch palivov ch z kladen (podpora BG, EE, EL, HU, PL, SK, RO, Eurelectric, EuroHeat&Power) Intermediate meeting (17.-18.6.2014) Zve ejn n Background Paper (vypo d n p ipom nek k D1) a n vrhu Z v r o BAT (2.4.2015) Final meeting (2.-10.6.2015) Split views (31.7.2015) P ipom nkov n z v r z FM (21.10.2015 zve ejn na 4.konsolidovan verze) Vypo d n split views a p edlo en p edfin ln ho n vrhu LCP BREF (22.2.2016) 06/2016 Final draft 20.10.2016 F rum dle l.13 IED 2

  4. REVIZE LCP BREF PRIORITY R R vznesla 6 split views na FM a dal 2 split views k leftovers NOx BAT-AELs (Tab. 10.3), SO2 BAT-AELs derogace pro lignite, TZL BAT-AELs (Tab.10.7) rtu BAT-AELs (Tab.10.9), aplikovatelnost d vkov n halogenovan ch aditiv ke sn en emis rtuti (BAT 23), NH3 monitoring (zm na z kontinu ln ho na periodick u za zen s SCR/SNCR a WFGD) energetick innost n prava diskrimina n ch po adavk na tepl rny definice agrega n ch pravidel zesoulad n se sm rnic K projedn n na F ru dle l. 13 IED R vznesla 14 p ipom nek: BAT 19 nav en NOx BAT-AELs (Tab.10.3) ze 175 na 190 mg/m3 ( 300 MWt CU/HU FBC a HU PC) a nav en (pro CU PC 300 MWt, kde nelze SCR) ze 150 na 180 mg/m3 BAT 21 nav en SO2 BAT-AELs ze 130 na 170 mg/m3 ( 300 MWt) + derogace pro HU, BAT 22 - nav en TZL BAT-AELs (Tab. 10.7) z 8 na 10 mg/m3 ( 1000 MWt), BAT 23 nav en BAT-AELs pro rtu (Tab.10.9) z 10/7 na 14/10 mg/m3 (<300/ 300 MWt), BAT 23f-g omezen aplikovatelnosti d vkov n sorbent a halogenovan ch aditiv, NH3 monitoring (zm na z kontinu ln ho na periodick u za zen s SCR/SNCR a WFGD) + derogace pro HCl (PL CU), aplikovatelnost SCR 3

  5. REVIZE LCP BREF IED PNP LCP BREF 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 IED PNP (tepl.) LCP BREF platnost z v r o BAT (od vyd n v edn m v stn ku EU p edpoklad v pol.2017) BAT-AELs aplikovateln pro nov za zen BAT-AELs aplikovateln pro st vaj c za zen (nejpozd ji 4 roky od vyd n z v r ) 4

  6. Final draft vs. draft 1 - srovn n NOx, CO (BAT 19), NH3(BAT 4) [MWt] D1 vs. FD NOx CO NH3 (BAT 4) Yearly average or average over the sampling period [mg/Nm ] < 5 < 3 10 < 5 < 3 10 < 1-3.5 < 3 10 Yearly average [mg/Nm ] Daily average [mg/Nm ] Yearly average [mg/Nm ] New or existing plant New plant Existing plant (4) New plant Existing plant D1 FD D1 FD D1 FD 100-200 100 150 100-150 50-100 50-150 50-85 100-270 100-270 100-180 100-180 50-180 <85-150 (8)(9) (175) [190] 65-180 65-150 [180] ND ND 4-80 <100 155-200 ND 80-130 140-220 80 125 165-330 ND 155-210 140-220 140-165 (10) (220) (340) 80-220 <85-165 (6)(200) (340) < 30 140 4-80 < 30 140 4-80 < 30 100 (1) 100-300 300 coal/lignite FBC or lignite PC 300 coal PC D1 FD 65-100 65-85 80-125 80-125 4-80 < 1-3.5 < 3 10 < 5 100 (1) (1) The higher end of the range may be up to 140 mg/Nm3 in the case of limitations due to boiler design, and/or in the case of fluidised bed boilers not fitted with secondary abatement techniques for NOX emissions reduction. (4) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1500 h/yr. (6) In the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the range is 200 mg/Nm3 for plants operated 1500 s h/yr, and 220 mg/Nm3 for plants operated < 1500 h/yr. (7) In the case of plants put into operation no later than 1 July 1987, which are operated < 1500 h/yr and for which SCR and/or SNCR is not applicable, the higher end of the range is 340 mg/Nm3. (8) The lower end of the range is considered achievable when using SCR. (9) The higher end of the range is 175 mg/Nm3 for FBC boilers put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and for lignite-fired PC boilers. (10) The higher end of the range is 220 mg/Nm3 for FBC boilers put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and for lignite-fired PC boilers. (11) These levels are indicative for plants operated < 500 h/yr. 5

  7. Final draft vs. draft 1 - srovn n SO2BAT-AELs (BAT 21) [MWt] D1 vs. FD Yearly average [mg/Nm ] New plant 150-200 150-200 80-150 80-150 10-75 10-75 20-150 20-75 Daily average [mg/Nm ] New plant ND 170-220 ND 135-200 25-110 25-110 ND 25-110 Existing plant ND 170-400 ND 135-220 (5)(250) 25-220 25-165(4)(205) ND 50-220 Existing plant (3) 150-400 150-360 80-200 95-200 10-130 10-130 (6)[170] 20-180 20-180 D1 FD D1 FD D1 FD D1 FD <100 100-300 300 PC 300 FBC (1) (1) For circulating fluidised bed boilers, the lower end of the range can be achieved by using high-efficiency wet FGD. The higher end of the range can be achieved by using boiler in-bed sorbent injection. (3) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1500 h/yr. (4) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 220 mg/Nm3 in the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and operated < 1500 h/yr. For other existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 205 mg/Nm3. (5) In the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range is 250 mg/Nm3. (6) The lower end of the range can be achieved when using low-sulphur fuel in combination with a wet abatement system. (7) These levels are indicative for plants operated < 500 h/yr. For a combustion plant with a total rated thermal input of more than 300 MW, which is specifically designed to fire indigenous lignite fuels and which can demonstrate that it cannot achieve the BAT-AELs mentioned in Table 10.5 for techno- economic reasons, the daily average BAT-AELs set out in Table 10.5 do not apply, and the upper end of the yearly average BAT-AEL range is as follows: (i) for a new FGD system: RCG x 0.01 with a maximum of 200 mg/Nm3; (ii) for an existing FGD system: RCG x 0.02 [0.03] with a maximum of 320 mg/Nm3; in which RCG represents the concentration of SO2 in the raw flue-gas as a yearly average (under the standard conditions given under General considerations) at the inlet of the SOX abatement system, expressed at a reference oxygen content of 6 vol-% O2. (iii) If boiler sorbent injection is applied as part of the FGD system, the RCG may be adjusted by taking into account the SO2 reduction efficiency of this technique ( BSI), as follows: RCG (adjusted) = RCG (measured) / (1- BSI). 6

  8. Final draft vs. draft 1 - srovn n TZL BAT-AELs (BAT 22) [MWt] D1 vs. FD Yearly average [mg/Nm ] (1) Daily average or average over the sampling period [mg/Nm ] New plant ND 4-16 ND 3-15 ND 3-10 4-10 3-10 New plant 2-15 2-5 2-10 2-5 < 5 2-5 < 3 2-5 Existing plant (3) 2-20 2-18 2-20 2-14 1-15 2-10(4) (12) < 1-10 2-8 [10] Existing plant 4-28 4-22(2) (28) 4-25 4-22(3)(25) 4-20 3-11(5) (20) 4-20 3-11(6) (14) D1 FD D1 FD D1 FD D1 FD < 100 100-300 300-1000 1000 (1) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1500 h/yr. (2) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 28 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014. (3) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 25 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014. (4) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 12 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014. (5) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 20 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014. (6) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 14 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014. (7) These levels are indicative for plants operated < 500 h/yr. 7

  9. Final draft vs. draft 1 - srovn n HCl, HF BAT-AELs (BAT 21) HCl HF [MWt] D1 vs. FD Average of samples obtained during one year [mg/Nm ] New plant Existing plant (1) < 1-5 1-6 < 1-5 1-3 1-5 (2)(4)(7)(20) [MWt] D1 vs. FD Average of samples obtained during one year [mg/Nm ] New plant < 0.1-2 < 1-3 < 0.1-2 < 1-2 Existing plant < 0.1-2 < 1-6 (3)(7) < 0.1-2 < 1-3 (3)(7) D1 FD D1 FD < 1-5 D1 FD D1 FD <100 < 100 2-10 (2)(20) < 1-5 100 100 (1) The lower end of these BAT-AEL ranges may be difficult to achieve in the case of plants fitted with wet FGD and a downstream gas-gas heater. (2) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 20 mg/Nm3 in the following cases: plants combusting fuels where the average chlorine content is 1000 mg/kg (dry) or higher; plants operated < 1500 h/yr; FBC boilers. These levels are indicative for plants operated < 500 h/yr. (3) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 7 mg/Nm3 in the following cases: plants fitted with wet FGD with a downstream gas-gas heater; plants operated < 1500 h/yr; FBC boilers. These levels are indicative for plants operated < 500 h/yr. (4) In the case of plants fitted with wet FGD with a downstream gas-gas heater, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 7 mg/Nm3. 8

  10. Final draft vs. draft 1 - srovn n Hg BAT-AELs (BAT 23) Hg (coal) [MWt] Hg (lignite) [MWt] D1 vs. FDYearly average or average of samples obtained during one year [ g/Nm ] New plant D1 0.5-5 FD < 1-3 D1 0.2-2 FD < 1-2 (2) The lower end of the BAT-AEL range can be achieved with specific mercury abatement techniques. D1 vs. FDYearly average or average of samples obtained during one year [ g/Nm ] New plant D1 1-10 FD < 1-5 D1 0.5-5 FD < 1-4 Existing plant Existing plant 2-20 <1-10(2) 0.5-10 < 1-7(2) 1-10 < 1-9(2) 0.2-6 < 1-4(2) < 300 < 300 300 300 - EIPPCB approved CAN Europe s split view on common BAT-AEL for all new and existing coal- and lignite-fired plants to be set to < 1 g/Nm3 (see SV assessement 11.15) EURACOAL introduced a report by prof. Kather, Hamburg University of Technology, where the BAT-AELs for mercury are discussed. The main outcomes of the report: there is a very large uncertainty for the continuous measurement of Hg (up to +/- 6 g/Nm3) there are very large spreads in Hg content of the different lignites the range for the new mercury BAT-AEL for existing lignite-fired power plants with PC boiler should be set between 5 and 9 g/Nm mercury contents in the fuel higher than 0.22 mg/kg (fuel input data gained within the LCP BREF revision process) have to be taken into account (CZ lignite: 0.10-0.60 mg/kg) - - - - - 9

  11. ODHADY DOPAD LCP BREF, MCPD N klady spojen s implementac Z v r o BAT v r zn ch sektorech pr myslu v R a dopad spojen ch s MCPD V roba eleza a oceli nyn v provozu odhadovan n klady v jimky V roba skla nyn v provozu odhadovan n klady v jimky Cement a v pno nyn v provozu odhadovan n klady v jimky Velk spalovac za zen nyn v provozu odhadovan n klady v jimky Sm rnice MCP st edn spalovac zdroje odhadovan n klady 14 za zen 10-20 mld. K 0 24 za zen 2 mld. K 7 10 za zen 1-2 mld. K 0 cca 110 za zen cca 15-20 mld. K ? cca 11 mld. K 10

  12. REVIZE LCP BREF N SLEDUJ C KROKY Stanovisko F ra dle l.13 IED (Q4/2016) Zapracov n stanoviska F ra a p edlo en n vrhu rozhodnut o z v rech o BAT v boru Komise dle l.75 IED (Q1/2017) Jedn n v boru Komise (Q1-2/2017) Stanovisko v boru Komise (Q1-2/2017) P ijet rozhodnut o z v rech o BAT Komis (Q2-4/2017) Zve ejn n rozhodnut v edn m v stn ku EU, vstup rozhodnut v platnost (Q3-4/2017). N sleduje 4 let lh ta pro uveden integrovan ch povolen st vaj c ch za zen do souladu s po adavky rozhodnut komise dle harmonogramu p ezkum integrovan ch povolen zve ej ovan ch M P. P EZKUM INTEGROVAN CH POVOLEN BUDE PROB HAT V RE IMU PODSTATN ZM NY. 11

  13. REVIZE LCP BREF D kuji za pozornost. 12

  14. TZL BAT-AELs Split view a p ipom nka R na F rum dle l.13 P ipom nka CZ: Horn mez ro n ho BAT-AEL zv it z 8 na 10 mg/Nm3pro st vaj c HU za zen >1000 MWt 13

  15. Revize LCP BREF Odvozen BAT-AELs pro Hg 18-1,2 Tepl rna Komo any 25-1 Elektr rna Hodon n 390-1-6 Elektr rna Tur w 23 Elektr rna Tu imice 130 Neurath E 137 Neurath A 19 Tepl rna T bor K7 116 Niederau em K 127 Schwarze Pumpe 22 Plze sk tepl rensk 14

More Related Content