Personhood & the Euthanasia debate

Personhood & the Euthanasia debate
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the ethical dimensions surrounding personhood and voluntary euthanasia through the lens of rationality, consciousness, and individual autonomy. Delve into Singer's argument on the right to die and the paradox of quality of life in end-of-life decisions.

  • Euthanasia
  • Personhood
  • Ethics
  • Autonomy
  • Rationality

Uploaded on Feb 23, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personhood & the Euthanasia debate Non Religious Arguments

  2. Read the sheet carefully and answer the following Qs: Explain why Singer says it is worse to kill a self conscious being than a merely conscious being . Why should voluntary euthanasia not cause people to be fearful? How can voluntary euthanasia ease peoples fear? According to preference utilitarianism, why is it wrong to murder? What would preference utilitarianism say about voluntary euthanasia? What point is Singer making about rights ?

  3. Peter Singers argument Voluntary Euthanasia = a person s desire to die People have no reason to fear something they do not have to consent to. VE can have a positive impact on the community as they are re-assured that they don t have to endure a long & painful death To not kill someone who wants to die is to thwart their desire for death A right to life implies a right to die VE is necessary in order to respect my status as a rational & autonomous person

  4. Qualities of personhood: Ability to reason Rational Self conscious includes having a preference about continued existence. Communicate Qualities of personhood make human life instrumentally valuable. It is having these qualities that makes life worth living (a good quality of life)

  5. The Argument from Personhood The wishes of a person opting for Voluntary Euthanasia should be respected because: They are rational so they ve thought it through carefully They have the ability to communicate their wishes They are aware of their situation They have a preference about their continued (non) existence. To deny a person the right to Voluntary Euthanasia is effectively to deny them their status as a person altogether.

  6. However PARADOX Persons who opt for Voluntary Euthanasia have a good quality of life (they still possess all the qualities of personhood) and so Voluntary Euthanasia should not be need to be an option for them. Individuals whose quality of life is so poor that voluntary euthanasia would be an option are no longer considered to be persons and so their views don t need to be trusted or respected.

  7. Written task: Imagine a conversation between a strict Catholic Christian, a fundamentalist Christian, a more liberal Christian like Joseph Fletcher, and Peter Singer debating whether voluntary active euthanasia should be legalised in the UK How do you think their conversation might go?

More Related Content