Pinning of Fermionic Occupation Numbers: Generalized Constraints and Applications

Pinning of Fermionic Occupation Numbers: Generalized Constraints and Applications
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Mathematical underpinnings and physics applications of pinning Fermionic occupation numbers, delving into Pauli's exclusion principle, generalized constraints, and their relevance in quantum physics. Discover the significance of pinning in defining fermion states and explore its implications in various scenarios.

  • Fermions
  • Quantum Physics
  • Pauli Exclusion
  • Occupation Numbers
  • Mathematical Constraints

Uploaded on Feb 21, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pinning of Fermionic Occupation Numbers Christian Schilling ETH Z rich in collaboration with M.Christandl, D.Ebler, D.Gross Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 040404 (2013)

  2. Outline 1) Motivation 2) Generalized Pauli Constraints 3) Application to Physics 4) Pinning Analysis 5) Physical Relevance of Pinning

  3. 1) Motivation Pauli s exclusion principle (1925): `no two identical fermions in the same quantum state mathematically: (quasi-) pinned by (quasi-) pinned by relevant when Aufbau principle for atoms

  4. strengthened by Dirac & Heisenberg in (1926): `quantum states of identical fermions are antisymmetric implications for occupation numbers ? further constraints beyond but only relevant if (quasi-) pinned (?)

  5. mathematical objects ? N-fermion states partial trace 1-particle reduced density operator natural occupation numbers translate antisymmetry of to 1-particle picture

  6. 2) Generalized Pauli Constraints describe this set Q: Which 1-RDO are possible? (Fermionic Quantum Marginal Problem) A: unitary equivalence: only natural occupation numbers relevant

  7. Polytope 1 1 0 [A.Klyachko., CMP 282, p287-322, 2008] [A.Klyachko, J.Phys 36, p72-86, 2006] Pauli exclusion principle

  8. polytope = intersection of finitely many half spaces facet: half space:

  9. Example: N = 3 & d= 6 [Borland&Dennis, J.Phys. B, 5,1, 1972] [Ruskai, Phys. Rev. A, 40,45, 2007]

  10. 3) Application to Physics or here ? (pinning) Position of relevant states (e.g. ground state) ? 1 here ? point on boundary : 1 0 kinematical constraints decay impossible generalization of:

  11. N non-interacting fermions: with 1-particle picture: N-particle picture: ( ) ( ) effectively 1-particle problem with solution

  12. Slater determinants Pauli exclusion principle constraints 1 exactly pinned! 1 0

  13. requirements for non-trivial model? N identical fermions with coupling parameter analytical solvable: depending on

  14. Hamiltonian: diagonalization of length scales:

  15. Now: Fermions restrict to ground state: [Z.Wang et al., arXiv 1108.1607, 2011] if non-interacting

  16. properties of : i.e. on depends only on from now on : non-trivial duality weak-interacting

  17. `Boltzmann distribution law: Thanks to J rg Fr hlich hierarchy:

  18. 4) Pinning Analysis too difficult/ not known yet instead: check w.r.t

  19. relevant as long as lower bound on pinning order

  20. relevant as long as quasi-pinning

  21. moreover : quasi-pinnig only for weak interaction ? No!: larger ? - quasi-pinning poster by Daniel Ebler excitations ? first few still quasi-pinned weaker with increasing excitation quasi-pinning a ground state effect !?

  22. 5) Physical Relevance of Pinning saturated by : Implication for corresponding ? Physical Relevance of Pinning ?

  23. generalization of: stable:

  24. Selection Rule:

  25. Example: dimension Pinning of

  26. Application: Improvement of Hartree-Fock approximate unknown ground state Hartree-Fock much better:

  27. Conclusions antisymmetry of translated to 1-particle picture Generalized Pauli constraints study of fermion model with coupling Pauli constraints pinned up to corrections Generalized Pauli constraints pinned up to corrections Pinning is physically relevant e.g. improve Hartree-Fock Fermionic Ground States simpler than appreciated (?)

  28. Outlook generic for: Hubbard model HOMO- LUMO- gap Quantum Chemistry: Atoms Physical & mathematical Intuition for Pinning Strongly correlated Fermions Antisymmetry Energy Minimization

  29. Thank you!

More Related Content