Preserving Nuclear Power: Roles of States and FERC in Electricity Regulation

p reserving n uclear p ower r oles of s tates n.w
1 / 13
Embed
Share

Explore the legal risks and challenges faced by states in regulating electricity generation post-industry restructuring, including FPA preemption issues and dormant Commerce Clause challenges. Discover insights on ZECs, PPAs, and their impact on wholesale rates, as well as ways to navigate state policies while preserving nuclear power.

  • Nuclear Power
  • Electricity Regulation
  • Legal Risks
  • State Policies
  • FERC

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PRESERVING NUCLEAR POWER: ROLESOF STATESAND FERC Ari Peskoe Senior Fellow in Electricity Law apeskoe@law.harvard.edu @aripeskoe

  2. How to Regulate Generation After Industry Restructuring? Challenge: Plant revenue not regulated by PUC Possible Workarounds: Restrict new generators with environmental regulations or siting rules e.g., emission performance standards, CO2 tax Induce new generators with utility procurement rules and/or financial products/incentives X Problem: Legal risk

  3. Legal Risks for State Policies FPA Preemption and dormant Commerce Clause challenges to state electricity policies www.StatePowerProject.org

  4. Legal Risks for State Policies Three legal claims about challenged state actions: 1. Regulate wholesale rates, intruding on FERC s exclusive jurisdiction (field preemption) 2. Stand as an obstacle to FERC regulation of just and reasonable rates (conflict preemption) 3. Favor in-state businesses in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause 4

  5. Do ZECs/PPAs Regulate Dormant Commerce Clause Wholesale Rates? 5

  6. Do ZECs/PPAs Regulate Dormant Commerce Clause Wholesale Rates? Our holding is limited: We reject Maryland s program only because it disregards an interstate wholesale rate required by FERC. . . . So long as a State does not condition payment of funds on capacity clearing the auction, the State s program would not suffer from the fatal defect that renders Maryland s program unacceptable. 6

  7. Do ZECs/PPAs stand as an obstacle Dormant Commerce Clause To FERC Regulation? FERC can set RTO rules to counteract the effects of state policies Plaintiffs have not articulated a limiting principle 7

  8. Discrimination Against Out-of-State Economic Interests Do ZECs/PPAs Discriminate? ZEC qualifications are even handed Preferring in-state businesses to spur local economic development is prohibited but not always fatal when the state has other aims too 8

  9. Is There a Legally Sustainable Path Forward? FERC s Post-Technical Conference Notice: Accommodation of State Actions Pricing State Policy Choices ( Achieve )

  10. Is There a Legally Sustainable Path Forward? FERC facilitated restructuring without new authorization from Congress: Market-based rates Open-access transmission ISO/RTO Guidelines Approvals of ISO/RTO formation Approvals of Energy market rules Approvals of capacity market rules

  11. Is There a Legally Sustainable Path Forward? Just and Reasonable rates: Balance consumer and investor interests Enhance competition Are consistent with the statute s principal purpose

  12. Is There a Legally Sustainable Path Forward? In response to a jurisdictional challenge: FERC s rationale for market reform must be all about, and only about, improving the wholesale market Court will not read the FPA, against its clear terms, to halt a practice that so evidently enables the Commission to fulfill its statutory duties

  13. Conclusions and Questions ZECs: Legality TBD, probably 2018 If ZECs are preempted, are RPS laws or RGGI next? Nuclear PPAs: Weak preemption argument (2nd Circuit decision to come), Commerce Clause concern depends on details of law If nuclear PPAs fall, are MA offshore wind, hydro procurements vulnerable? Integrating public policy in wholesale markets: Will an RTO propose an achieve strategy?

More Related Content