Progress Review of IQA Mechanism at University of Health Sciences, Lahore
This progress review presentation discusses the current standing of the Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) at the institution, including its officers, premises, and membership in statutory bodies. Analysis of last year's performance highlights strengths in active participation in workshops and conferences, as well as weaknesses such as incomplete program documentation. Identified weak areas focus on issues like lack of influence in affiliated institutions and financial autonomy.
Uploaded on Apr 12, 2025 | 0 Views
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
University of Health Sciences, Lahore PROGRESS REVIEW OF IQA MECHANISM PRESENTED BY: PROF. ARIF RASHID KHAWAJA DATE: 15THMAY, 2017 11:23:59 PM STARTED AT: 1
Current standing of QEC in the institution The QEC is directly reporting to Head of the DAI YES Permanent and spacious premises is being allotted for QEC YES STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 2
Current standing of QEC in the institution Number of Permanent/Full time QEC Officers/Officials S.No. 1 Name Designation Date of Joining QEC Prof. Dr. Arif Rashid Khawaja Director 6-Dec-2010 BPS-20 2 Dr. Allah Rakha Deputy Director 26-Dec-2012 (Additional Charge) 3 Data Analyst 13-Jul-2011 Waqas Latif BPS-17 4 Personal Assistant 9-Jul-2011 Noreen Aslam BPS-11 STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 3
Current standing of QEC in the institution Number of Statutory Bodies for which Head of QEC is a member including Plagiarism Standing Committee, Affiliation Committee etc. S.No. Name of Body/ Committee Membership Status 1 Senate/ Board of Trustees - 2 Syndicate/ Board of Governors/Executive Committee 3 Academic Council 4 Board of Advanced Studies & Research 5 Selection Board 6 Finance & Planning Committee 7 Board of Faculty or Equivalent - 8 Board of Studies 9 Affiliation Committee 10 Discipline Committee STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 4
Analysis of last year performance as per scorecard of 2015-16 Strengths (related to last year score card) 1. Regular workshops, conference attendance and participation in QAA activities actively Weaknesses (related to last year scorecard) 1. Incomplete SAR of remaining programme 2. Incomplete online proforma 3. Permanent deputy director (Advertisement given, interview to be held soon) STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 5
Analysis of last year performance as per scorecard of 2015-16 STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 6
STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 7
Weak Areas Identified (related to functionality of QEC) 1. Lack of influence in affiliated institutions. 2. No financial autonomy in executing the functions of QEC. 3. The budget is approved by BOG and can reduce the budget. 4. There seems to be lack of guidance on certain issues from QAA. (Recent communication) STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 8
Implementation Plan and Actions Taken to address Weak Areas identified in previous slide Implementation Status To be discussed in the current forum Action Plan Accordingly STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 9
Hindrances in achieving the targets 1. Financial constraints in implement QAA in affiliated institutions. 2. Lack of interest in Quality Assurance in the faculty if these institution. 3. Lack of staff to perform the massive task of QA implementation. 4. Unrealistic time frame. STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 10
Help Required from HEC 1. Clear guideline to HEI regarding the status of QEC including Director QEC. 2. Clear guideline about the budget for QEC in the recurring grant. 3. Implementation of job progression with in the staff of QEC with regards to promotion and increments. (Lack of job structure). 4. All QEC heads having W Ranking status to be given BPS-21 and this condition should be included in the ranking of the university. STARTED AT: 11:23:59 PM 11
Questions / Answer Session 11:23:59 PM STARTED AT: 12
