Proposal 2 Evaluation and Algorithm Description
This proposal introduces add-ons to the existing mechanism for gaining and losing rights in meetings, emphasizing consecutive attendances and types of meetings attended. The algorithm retains and enhances the rules, impacting the acquisition and maintenance of voting rights for participants. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed, along with evaluations on gaining and losing rights based on meeting participation patterns
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Proposal 2 Name Short Description Evaluation Link Existing mechanism plus following add-ons Add-on: 3 consecutive attendances to gain rights Add-on: 2 consecutive (at least 1 e-meeting) miss to lose rights 3 Contiguous-2e 3 Contiguous-2e
Description of the Algorithm 1. Existing rules retained, but only F2F meetings are counted. Rules on F2F override below add-ons (e.g. for missing 3 consecutive F2F meetings even if there are e-meetings between) 2. Add-on: Rights also gained on 3 consecutive attendances (any type of meeting) 3. Add-on: Rights lost on missing 2 consecutive meetings, at least one of which is an e-meeting.
Advantages/Disadvantages Advantage: Retains existing rules for f2f Advantage: Gives same result as existing rules for f2f only case Advantage: Makes it difficult to gain or maintain rights through only e-meetings Disadvantage: Require less IM s commitment to 3GPP as IM can maintain voting rights by only attending 50% of e-meetings
Eval 1: How fast can an IM gain rights (assume no rights or history initially and that the IM attends every meeting) EEEEEEEEEEEE a. All e-meetings: Please position the arrows appropriately for the proposed algorithm EFEEEFEEEFEE b. Mostly e-meetings : EFEFEFEFEFEF c. Alternating: E = attended e-meeting E= missed e-meeting F = attended f2f F = missed f2f FEFFEFFEFFEF d. Supplemental e-meetings: EFFFEFFFEFFF e. Mostly f2f: FFFFFFFFFFFF f. All f2f:
Eval 2: How fast can an IM gain rights through only e-meetings (assume no rights or history initially and that the IM only attends e-meetings) EEEEEEEEEEEE a. All e-meetings: Please position the arrows appropriately for the proposed algorithm EFEEEFEEEFEE b. Mostly e-meetings : EFEFEFEFEFEF Never gains voting rights c. Alternating: E = attended e-meeting E= missed e-meeting F = attended f2f F = missed f2f FEFFEFFEFFEF Never gains voting rights d. Supplemental e-meetings: EFFFEFFFEFFF Never gains voting rights e. Mostly f2f: FFFFFFFFFFFF Never gains voting rights f. All f2f:
Eval 3: How fast will an IM lose rights if only attending e-meetings (assume rights but no history initially and that the IM only attends e-meetings) Please position the arrows appropriately for the proposed algorithm EEEEEEEEEEEE Never loses voting rights a. All e-meetings: EFEEEFEEEFEE b. Mostly e-meetings : E = attended e-meeting E= missed e-meeting F = attended f2f F = missed f2f EFEFEFEFEFEF c. Alternating: FEFFEFFEFFEF d. Supplemental e-meetings: EFFFEFFFEFFF e. Mostly f2f: FFFFFFFFFFFF f. All f2f:
Eval 4: How fast will an IM lose rights if they stop attending anything (assume rights but no history initially and that the IM does not attend anything) Please position the arrows appropriately for the proposed algorithm EEEEEEEEEEEE a. All e-meetings: EFEEEFEEEFEE b. Mostly e-meetings : E = attended e-meeting E= missed e-meeting F = attended f2f F = missed f2f EFEFEFEFEFEF c. Alternating: FEFFEFFEFFEF d. Supplemental e-meetings: EFFFEFFFEFFF e. Mostly f2f: FFFFFFFFFFFF f. All f2f:
Eval 5: How fast will an IM lose rights if only attending some e- meetings (assume rights but no history initially and that the IM only attends e-meetings) EEEEEEEEEEEE Please position the arrows appropriately for the proposed algorithm Never loses voting rights a. Attends 75% e-meetings EEEEEEEEEEEE Never loses voting rights b Attends 50% e-meetings E = attended e-meeting E= missed e-meeting F = attended f2f F = missed f2f EEEEEEEEEEEE c. Attends 50% e-meetings EEEEEEEEEEEE d. Attends 25% e-meetings
Eval 6: How fast will an IM lose rights if only attending of e- meetings (assume rights but no history initially and that the IM only attends ever other e-meeting) EEEEEEEEEEEE Please position the arrows appropriately for the proposed algorithm Never loses voting rights a. All e-meetings: EFEEEFEEEFEE b. Mostly e-meetings : E = attended e-meeting E= missed e-meeting F = attended f2f F = missed f2f EFEFEFEFEFEF c. Alternating: FEFFEFFEFFEF d. Supplemental e-meetings: EFFFEFFFEFFF e. Mostly f2f: FFFFFFFFFFFF f. All f2f:
