Proposals to Increase Accessibility of Judicial Decisions - Amendments for Better Transparency

proposals to amend the legislation to increase n.w
1 / 7
Embed
Share

Explore proposals by Giorgi Davituri to amend legislation for enhanced accessibility of judicial decisions. The amendments aim to establish a balance without hierarchy among human rights, promote proactive disclosure of judicial acts, and regulate the disclosure of personal data in the absence of legitimate protection expectations. Learn more about the imperative changes suggested for a fair and transparent legal system.

  • Proposals
  • Judicial Decisions
  • Legislation
  • Transparency
  • Human Rights

Uploaded on | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Proposals to amend the legislation to increase accessibility of judicial decisions Giorgi Davituri 2017, Tbilisi

  2. Proposals to amend the legislation to increase accessibility of judicial decisions Proposals regarding legislation Proposals regarding proactive disclosure of judicial acts

  3. Proposals to amend the legislation to increase accessibility of judicial decisions Imperative Balance between conflict interest should not be stipulated by law There is no hierarchy among human rights. Legal mean to evaluate conflict interest case by case shall be stipulated. Public interest test shall be stipulated and applied case by case

  4. Proposals to amend the legislation to increase accessibility of judicial decisions High profile civil servants default openness of specific personal data Exceptions in exceptional cases Data of the minors close personal data by default

  5. Proposals to amend the legislation to increase accessibility of judicial decisions personal data shall be disclosed if there is no legitimate expectation to protect it if the data is accessible publicly according to the law. Legitimate expectation of personal data protection shall be considered 195. The Court also finds that the disclosure of public defenders names and the number of their respective appointments would not have subjected them to exposure to a degree surpassing that which they could possibly have foreseen when registering as public defenders (compare and contrast Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, 62, ECHR 2003-I). There is no reason to assume that information about the names of public defenders and their appointments could not be known to the public through other means, such as information contained in lists of legal-aid providers, court hearing schedules and public court hearings, although it is clear that it was not collated at the moment of the survey. 196. Against this background, the interests invoked by the Government with reference to Article 8 of the Convention are not According to the Tbilisi City Court, disclosure of the criminal case against former prime minister of Georgia would be violation of Georgian Legislation and the information was protected by art. 8 of the European convention on human rights of such a nature and degree as could warrant engaging the application of this provision and bringing it into play in a balancing exercise against the applicant NGO s right as protected by paragraph 1 of Article 10 (CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTS G v. HUNGARY, par. 194-195).

  6. Proposals to amend the legislation to increase accessibility of judicial decisions Proposals regarding proactive disclosure of judicial acts Names/titles of legal persons shall be published without covering; Interim judicial acts shall be published Format of published judicial acts shall be defined (including open text format) Search field by the parties shall be defined (where depersonalization is not required by the law) Procedure to disclosed decisions of closed hearing shall be defined. Webpage shall be adapted to the needs of the persons with disabities

  7. Proposals to amend the legislation of Georgia Giorgi Davituri 2017, Tbilisi

Related


More Related Content