PSE Evaluation: FFY17 Reporting Results in California

california department of public health snap n.w
1 / 25
Embed
Share

"Explore the aggregated data from FFY 2017 PSE work in California, including the reach, focus areas, settings, and more. Gain insights to inform and enhance future PSE efforts across the state."

  • Evaluation
  • California
  • Public Health
  • SNAP-Ed
  • PSE

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. California Department of Public Health SNAP-Ed Evaluation: PSE FFY17 Reporting Results Nutrition Policy Institute

  2. Acronyms and definitions ECE Early Childcare and Education FFY Federal Fiscal Year, from Oct 1 Sept 30 LHD Local Health Department NPI Nutrition Policy Institute (the contracted agency for CDPH SNAP-Ed evaluation) PA Physical Activity PSE Policy, Systems and Environmental Change PEARS Program Evaluation and Reporting System (online SNAP-Ed reporting system developed by Kansas State University)

  3. Introduction Thank you for your hard work and tireless efforts in planning and implementing SNAP-Ed PSEs! We also thank you for the time you have spent reporting your PSE work into PEARS. The following slides show aggregated data for all LHDs, based on what was reported for FFY 2017. These data show where PSEs are collectively focused, the types of strategies that are most frequently adopted, the most common barriers and assets to PSE work, and other key aspects asked about in PEARS. Check the slide notes section throughout this slide deck for important points and take-aways. You will also receive a similar set of slides that summarize the FFY 2017 PSE work from your own LHD. We hope that providing these 2 slide decks will help inform your on-going and future PSE efforts by shining a light on facets of PSE work that you may not have considered before and by allowing you to compare your local efforts with what s happening across the state. We welcome your feedback and questions!

  4. PSE reach 56 LHDs 1180 sites over 2 million people average 21 sites/LHD 4.6 settings/LHD (range: 1-21 settings) On average, worked with sites for 2 years (range: 1-11 years)

  5. Where are PSE changes being made? (1180 sites total) Eat: 2% - Congregate meal site/senior nutrition center:<1% - Fast food chains: 1% - Restaurants: <1% Learn: 63% - Before/Afterschool programs: 11% - Colleges & Universities: <1% - Early care and education: 14% - Libraries: <1% - Schools (K-12): 36% Live: 11% - Community organizations: 2% - Faith / places of worship: 5% - Family resource centers: <1% - Group living arrangements: <1% - Low-income health clinics: <1% - Public housing: 2% - Residential treatment centers: <1% - Shelters: <1% Play: 4% - Bicycle and walking paths: <1% - Community centers: 2% - Gardens (community or school)*: <1% - Parks and open spaces: 1% - Youth Organizations (e.g. Boys or Girls Clubs, YMCA): <1% Shop: 16% - Farmers markets: 1% - Food banks and pantries: 2% - Large food stores (4+ registers): 3% - Small food stores (<= 3 registers): 10% Work: 4% - SNAP offices: <1% - Worksites with low-wage workers: 4%

  6. USDA Priority Sites (n=1180 sites) USDA summer meal site: 23% Indian reservation: 0% Military base: 0%

  7. Stage of implementation (n=1180 sites) Maintaining or conducting follow-up 7% Initiation or planning 30% Actively making changes 62%

  8. Which settings had the highest reach? Setting Total Reach # of Sites Reach/site Large/small food stores Schools (K-12) Before/after school Food banks and pantries Early childhood Farmers markets Community centers Community organizations Faith-based 1,143,641 706,815 31,495 22,490 18,275 15,750 14,036 13,764 11,722 74 15,455 2533 272 2249 179 3938 739 1376 404 279 116 10 102 4 19 10 29

  9. PSE changes implemented by setting Number of sites implementing PSE changes by major setting DOMAIN: Setting: LEARN Before/After- school EAT/SHOP Schools ECE Stores Food banks Farmers markets Total # of sites 423 135 165 117 10 22 Number and percent of sites that adopted at least 1 change Number and percent* of sites that made more than 1 change Average*, range of changes/site 291 (69%) 121 (90%) 106 (64%) 84 8 10 (56%) (80%) (45%) 232 (80%) 80 88 47 6 2 (66%) (83%) (56%) (75%) (20%) 3.2, 1-15 2.1, 1-16 4.7, 1-14 2.4, 1-9 2.4, 1-4 1.3, 1-3

  10. PSE changes implemented by setting Combinations of PSE changes implemented by major setting DOMAIN: Setting: LEARN Before/After- school EAT/SHOP Schools ECE Stores Food banks Farmers markets Number of sites that adopted at least 1 change 291 121 106 84 8 10 Percent of sites* with changes: nutrition only 47% 9% 44% 16% 33% 17% 50% 3% 16% 9% 74% 35% 95% 0% 5% 24% 62% 0% 38% 25% 90% 0% 10% 0% PA only nutrition + PA food + promo

  11. PSE changes in schools (n=291) Percent of sites by type of change made Gardens Wellness policies Quantity / quality of foods offered Marketing and display/layout PA pportunity (non-PE) Food procurement/distribution Water Facilities - food Facilities - physical Active transport Meal program access/participation PE PA as punishment 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

  12. PSE changes in before/afterschool (n=121) Percent of sites by type of change made Quantity / quality of foods offered Wellness policies Gardens Active transport Food procurement/distribution Marketing and display/layout Student/community involvement Facilities - physical Water PA opportunity PA quality PA prompts New venues/access Facilities - food 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

  13. PSE changes in ECE (n=106) % of sites by type of change made Wellness policies PA opportunity Feeding practices Quantity / quality of foods offered Gardens Facilities - physical PA quality Water PA as punishment Food procurement/distribution Marketing and display/layout 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

  14. PSE changes in stores (n=84) % of Sites by Type of PSE Change Marketing and display/layout Facilities Quantity/quality of foods offered New venues/access Food procurement Increased awareness of PSE Active transport 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  15. PSE changes in farmers markets and food banks (n=18) % of Sites by Type of PSE Change Food procurement/distribution Marketing and display/layout Facilities (PA/food/access) Water Quantity/quality of foods offered New venues/access PA opportunity Increased awareness of PSE 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

  16. Intervention Topics (n=1180) Chronic disease prevention: 17% Shopping, resource management: 13% Water consumption: 27% Fruit and vegetable consumption: 66% Limiting fat consumption: 6% Protein foods:6% Active transit: 9% Limiting added sugars: 18% Reducing sedentary activities: 15% MyPlate food groups, portions: 39% Dairy consumption: 10% Sports and recreational activities: 8% Healthy Fats and Oils: 5% Promoting/maintaining healthy weight: 10% Fiber-rich foods: 8% Limiting sodium: 7% Food preparation, cooking, safety: 11% Whole grains: 10%

  17. Top 3 Programs, Packages, Initiatives (n=1180) 1. Harvest of the Month: 35% 2. Rethink Your Drink: 22% 3. School Wellness Policy: 18%

  18. Complementary activities (n=1180 sites) Evidence-based education: 53% Staff training: 51% Marketing/Promotion*: 51% Community involvement: 43% At least 1 of the above activities: 88% Image result for images community Youth involvement: 20%

  19. SNAP-Ed Role: % of sites by role (n=1180 sites) Initiation Guidance Training Lead Supportive Evaluation Implementation Engagement 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  20. Sustainability mechanisms: Complete or in process (n=1180 sites) Stakeholder support Assumed by another org Policies Other funding Monitoring/reporting 56% 44% 42% 41% 35% Image result for images for support At least 1 mechanism 67%

  21. Assessments (n=1180 sites) Needs or readiness assessments: 54% Including environmental scans and staff and organizational readiness Individual-level effectiveness: 10%

  22. Recognition and Media Coverage (n=1180 sites) Awards/recognition (3% of sites) Image result for images for prize Media Coverage (9% of sites) Local news (4%) Social media (3%) Partner website (2%)

  23. Top 3 Barriers & Assets (n=1180 sites) Barriers Assets Time: 39% Competition: 27% Stakeholder buy-in: 64% Leaders/champions: 41% Community/parent buy-in: 32% (from unhealthy options) Stakeholder buy-in: 21% https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSx0U-C9Y8Dwx1ofZ7vRsTfdbMjVYOaBx9UKEgoplbcV4qTJGmh6yPbbvp8

  24. California SNAP-Ed Theory of Change Model

  25. Questions? For NPI programmatic support, email: EvaluateSNAPEd@ucanr.edu KSU PEARS Support Website: https://support.pears.oeie.org/ CDPH/NPI PEARS Website (links to training webinars, printable materials, and CDPH-specific resources): http://ucanr.edu/sites/CDPH_PEARS/ KSU Office Hours (technical support): every other Wednesday, 1:00 PM PST https://ksu.zoom.us/j/543214262 1(646)558-8656; meeting ID: 543 214 262 CDPH/NPI SNAP-Ed Office Hours (programmatic support): 4th Thursday of the month, 1:30 PM PST 1(669)900-6833; meeting ID: 260 319 270

Related


More Related Content