Rénovation du BTS Professions Immobilières: Présentation du Référentiel

Que recouvre l'expression professions immobilières? Les métiers de la gestion immobilière, de la transaction immobilière et du management de projet immobilier sont expliqués. Découvrez le BTS Professions Immobilières, une formation reconnue offrant des compétences en transaction et gestion, nécessitant l'acquisition de cartes professionnelles. Pourquoi une rénovation? Éléments essentiels à considérer pour intégrer les évolutions du secteur immobilier.

• Immobilier
• BTS
• Gestion
• Transaction
• Formation

ayrielsc Follow

Uploaded on Apr 16, 2025 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

Presentation Transcript

1. WPR AND WHY IT MAY BE DECLINING Research and Analytics Section Bureau of Working Families Division of Families and Economic Security June 2017

2. 2 The WPR has been declining since the start of 2016 50% 45% 40% 35% WPR All Families Rate 30% 25% WI WPR 3 per. Mov. Avg. (WI WPR) 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

3. 3 Caseloads have been declining for CSJ and W2T placements since 2014 10000 9000 8000 7000 Number of Participants 6000 5000 CSJ W2T 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 2014-01 2014-02 2014-03 2014-04 2014-05 2014-06 2014-07 2014-08 2014-09 2014-10 2014-11 2014-12 2015-01 2015-02 2015-03 2015-04 2015-05 2015-06 2015-07 2015-08 2015-09 2015-10 2015-11 2015-12 2016-01 2016-02 2016-03 2016-04 2016-05 2016-06 2016-07 2016-08 2016-09 2016-10 2016-11 2016-12 2017-01 2017-02 2017-03 2017-04

4. 4 The CSJ WPR numerator participants have been declining though they may be beginning to level out. The W2T numerator participants have been more steady, though some decline started in 2016. 3500 Number of Placement Participants in the WPR Numerator 3000 2500 2000 CSJ 1500 W2T 1000 500 0 2014-01 2014-02 2014-03 2014-04 2014-05 2014-06 2014-07 2014-08 2014-09 2014-10 2014-11 2014-12 2015-01 2015-02 2015-03 2015-04 2015-05 2015-06 2015-07 2015-08 2015-09 2015-10 2015-11 2015-12 2016-01 2016-02 2016-03 2016-04 2016-05 2016-06 2016-07 2016-08 2016-09 2016-10 2016-11 2016-12 2017-01 2017-02 2017-03 2017-04

5. 5 The CSJ caseload decline and the number of CSJ participants in the WPR numerator have parallel declines 10000 3500 9000 3000 8000 CSJ WPR Numerator Participants 2500 7000 CSJ W-2 Caseload 6000 2000 5000 CSJ W-2 1500 CSJ WPR Num 4000 3000 1000 2000 500 1000 0 0

6. 6 The decline in the W2T WPR numerator participants began in 2016 5000 350 4500 300 4000 W2T WPR Numerator Participants 250 3500 W2T W-2 Caseload 3000 200 2500 W2T W-2 150 W2T WPR Num 2000 1500 100 1000 50 500 0 0

7. 7 Is the decline in the W2T WPR numerator participants starting in 2016 causing the overall WPR decline? The correlation from 2016-01 through 2017-04 is 0.91 45% 250 40% 200 35% 30% 150 W2T WPR Num 25% WPR Rate WPR 20% W2T WPR Num 100 15% 10% 50 5% 0% 0

8. 8 WPR versus W2T WPR Numerator Participants ROSS MAXIMUS 50% 60 40% 9 49% 57 38% 8 8 34% 35% 48% 32% 50 31%31% 7 7 30% 46% 45% 40 6 45% W2T WPR Numerator W2T WPR Numerator 5 25% 5 44% 43% WPR Rate WPR Rate 5 WPR WPR 30 20% 4 W2T Num W2T Num 4 41% 42% 15% 20 3 40% 10% 11 11 2 8 10 38% 5 5% 1 36% 0 0% 0 Q1'16Q2'16Q3'16Q4'16Q1'17 Q1'16Q2'16Q3'16Q4'16Q1'17

9. 9 WPR versus W2T WPR Numerator Participants AWWI UMOS 40% 30 50% 60 47% 28 54 34% 45% 42% 33% 35% 25 50 30% 40% 38% 45 36% 30% 35% 28% 28% 35% 20 40 W2T WPR Numerator W2T WPR Numerator 25% 35 30% WPR Rate WPR Rate 29 WPR WPR 20% 15 25% 30 13 W2T Num W2T Num 24 20% 15% 10 10 10 20 15% 8 10% 10% 5 10 5% 5% 0% 0 0% 0 Q1'16Q2'16Q3'16Q4'16Q1'17 Q1'16Q2'16Q3'16Q4'16Q1'17

10. 10 WPR versus W2T WPR Numerator Participants FSC RESCARE 45% 40 35% 14 13 34% 37 34% 38% 40% 35 12 33% 33% 35% 30 10 32% 29% 30% 31% 27% 27% W2T WPR Numerator W2T WPR Numerator 24 25 31% 8 WPR Rate WPR Rate 25% 30% 19 WPR WPR 20 30% 18 W2T Num W2T Num 16 20% 6 29% 29% 29% 15 15% 4 28% 4 3 3 10 10% 2 27% 2 5 5% 26% 0% 0 25% 0 Q1'16Q2'16Q3'16Q4'16Q1'17 Q1'16Q2'16Q3'16Q4'16Q1'17

11. 11 WPR versus W2T WPR Numerator Participants WCI WRI 40% 60% 9 8 34% 8 35% 48% 50% 7 7 44% 44% 44% 30% 6 39% 26% 26% 40% 6 25% W2T WPR Numerator 25% 23% 5 WPR Rate WPR Rate 5 WPR 20% 30% WPR W2T Num 4 15% Note: Only 1 W2T WPR numerator participant recorded in Q1'16; 0 participants in all other quarters 3 20% 3 10% 2 10% 5% 1 0% 0% 0 Q1'16 Q2'16 Q3'16 Q4'16 Q1'17 Q1'16Q2'16Q3'16Q4'16Q1'17