Reflexivity in Neoliberal Academia: Lay or Sociological?
This discussion delves into the distinction between lay and sociological forms of reflexivity in the context of neoliberal academia, exploring implications for knowledge, identity politics, research processes, and the legitimization of academic knowledge in society. Key theorists like Bourdieu, Archer, and their perspectives on reflexivity are analyzed, shedding light on the evolving relationship between personal experiences and sociological understanding.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Lay or Sociological? Bourdieu, Archer, and Reflexivity in the Neoliberal Academia Jana Bacevic Department of Sociology University of Cambridge @jana_bacevic Recovering the social: personal troubles and public issues BSA annual conference, University of Manchester, 4-6 April 2017
Outline Distinction between lay and sociological forms of reflexivity stems from concept s theoretical biography, but has implications for - Question of knowledge - Question of epistemic status of personhood (identity politics) - Question of research process - Question of legitimation, sociological/specialized/professional knowledge - Question of sociological futures including of Particularly relevant in context of increasing pressure to account for and justify distinctive contribution of academic knowledge (vis- -vis post-truth , anti-expert etc. discourse) to society
Reflexivity: (brief and very reductive) theoretical biography Giddens, Beck, Lash, Bauman: weakening/dissolution of bonds of tradition in late modernity compels subjects to deliberate on their circumstances, reflexively making their way through the world => knowledgeable agents Archer: reflexivity - deliberation circumstances impinging ultimate concerns, + decision on the course of action Bourdieu: sociological reflexivity - awareness and (possible) mastery of constraints that impinge on the scientific subject of which she must free herself on objective relation on oneself, to
Common denominators (a) conditions/circumstances (b) Self (as epistemic subject and agent) (c) Relationship between (a) and (b) Identification/knowledge of (~objective) [Creation of epistemic distance] 1. What is the relationship between lay and sociological forms of practising reflexivity? 2. What is the role/status of procedures/professional socialisation in the establishment of difference between these forms of reflexivity?
Archer (2007) Reflexivity, exercised through internal conversation not only mediates the impact of social forms upon us but also determines our responses to them ( ) If it is held that agential subjectivity has itself been molded by social influences, such as ideology, habitus or, for argument s sake, discourse , it is impossible to ascertain for whom this is and is not the case without examining their inner dialogue. It cannot be the case for all, because the sociologist has seen through these attempts at ideational misrepresentation in order to be able to describe them, but cannot claim a monopoly on this ability. For a person to find a vested interest good does not entail that she has full discursive penetration of that property, as if she were endowed with all the qualities of the best sociologist.
Different types of things? Archer s critical realism: clarification of the ontological foundations of subjects experience => Accounting for the empirical object in terms of subjectivity constructed by the empirical subject ( lay knowledge as epistemic proto-exemplar, Cruickshank 2010) Bourdieusian praxeological sociology: clarification of epistemological foundations of sociologists reading of subjects experience Accounting for the empirical subject in terms of objectivity constructed by the scientific subject
And never the twain shall meet? But: seeping of sociological theories into everyday life; (e.g. critiques of left-wing bias in academia) => double hermeneutic (Giddens) Context of critique (Boltanski): ( lay ) actors regularly engage in criticising or challenging elements of policy etc. (e.g.the critique of neoliberalism) But: transformation of conditions of academic labour = decreasing distance between us and circumstances : degrees of complex exteriority Context of justification: invoking (sociological) reflexivity increasingly necessary to account for the funding for, status and value of social science to society (public engagement, impact)
Boltanski (2011) Metacritical theories of domination encounter in an especially vexed fashion the issue of the relationship between the knowledge of social reality which is that of ordinary actors, reflexively engaged in practice, and the knowledge of social reality conceived from a reflexivity reliant on forms and instruments of [sociological] totalization an issue which is itself at the heart of the tensions out of which the possibility of a social science must be created.
Lay vs. sociological? Conceptualising difference between lay and sociological reflexivity becomes all the more relevant with pressures to justify the distinctive contribution of academic knowledge to society This conceptualisation cannot proceed on the grounds of fundamental distinction between lay and sociological reflexivity, because it lends itself to critique of e.g. Trump and Brexit voters as (insufficiently? differently?) reflexive, reinforcing the gulf between us and them
How to think about reflexivity in the post- truth era? Multiple knowledges, epistemologies, ontologies (alter-realities) Self-decolonisation: applying the critique of representation of the Other to the representation of Self
