Review and Expiration of Existing Rules Process
"Learn about the periodic review and expiration process of existing rules as mandated by the General Assembly. The Rules Review Commission ensures agencies review all rules every 10 years, categorizing them as necessary with or without substantive public interest or unnecessary. Public comments and responses play a crucial role in the final decisions." (Characters: 296)
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules (G.S. 150B-21.3A) Jennifer Everett DENR Rulemaking Coordinator Office of General Counsel 919-707-8614 11/14/13
Session Law 2013-413, House Bill 74 An Act to Improve and Streamline the Regulatory Process in Order to Stimulate Job Creation, to Eliminate Unnecessary Regulation, to Make Various Other Statutory Changes, and to Amend Certain Environmental and Natural Resources Laws. Part 1, Section 3.(b)- Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules Created G.S. 150B-21.3A (Administrative Procedures Act)
Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules What is it? the General Assembly is requiring the Rules Review Commission (RRC) to implement a process to ensure that agencies subject to the rulemaking requirements of Article 2A of G.S. 150B review all existing rules every 10 years. RRC will set a schedule for reviewing all rules.
Part 1, Section 3.(d) - the RRC shall subject rules adopted by the EMC related to surface water quality and wetlands to review in the first year that the RRC establishes for the review of existing rules
Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules What Is The Process? Staff to classify rules into one of three categories: - Necessary with substantive public interest. (G.S. 150B-21.3A(a)(3)) - Necessary without substantive public interest. (G.S. 150B-21.3A(a)(4)) - Unnecessary (G.S. 150B-21.3A(a)(6))
EMC approves the categorizations. Rules and categorizations go out for 60 day public comment period. Rules are posted on agency website.
Staff provide responses to all comments that are objections. EMC approves responses and any category changes based on comments. Report is submitted to RRC and includes all comments.
RRC reviews the comments received for rules placed in the necessary without substantive public interest and unnecessary categories. RRC makes final decision and report. RRC submits report to Joint Legislative Administrative Procedures Oversight Committee (APO).
If APO does not meet within 60 days for a consultation then RRC determinations will become effective on the 61st of submission. If the APO does meet then the report will become effective on the day they reviewed it. If APO disagrees with a determination in the RRC report, the APO may recommend that the General Assembly direct the agency to conduct a review of specific rule in the following year.
Final Determinations and Next Steps Necessary with Substantive Public Interest = Rules get readopted Necessary without Substantive Public Interest = Rules remain in the Code Unnecessary Rules = expire
Where are we in the process? RRC is drafting rules for this process. Public comment available early 2014. DENR in planning stage for setting up website. Initial steps in a draft schedule.
