
Rollout of Health Facility Registry in Nigeria
"Implementing a strategic action plan to update the Health Facility Registry in Nigeria by adding new facilities, deleting non-existent ones, and conducting facility visits to improve data quality and completeness."
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Module 1.1 Review Action Plan Rollout of Health Facility Registry/Master Facility List for States and Local Government Areas in Nigeria June 2019
Outline 1. Add new facilities 2. Delete nonexistent facilities 3. Facility visits 4. Completed forms 5. Quality of forms
Add new facilities from LGA-maintained list # Description 1 Facilities in the Master Facility List (MFL) 2 Facilities in local government area (LGA) list 3=(1-2) Difference between MFL and LGA lists 4 Facilities to be added to MFL from LGA Comment: Certain facilities on the LGA list need to be discarded, because they are duplicates.
Add new facilities from DHIS 2-maintained list # Description 5 Facilities in the MFL 6 Facilities in DHIS 2 list 7=(5-6) Difference between MFL & DHIS 2 lists 8 Facilities to be added to MFL from DHIS 2 Comment: Certain facilities on the DHIS 2 list need to be discarded, because they are duplicates.
Delete nonexistent facilities % of deletions documented # Description 9 Facilities in the MFL 10 Facilities to be deleted* 11=(9-10) Number of facilities remaining after deletion Comment: Facilities to be deleted either are duplicates or never existed.
Total number of facilities remaining on MFL # Description 12=(4+8+11) Total number of facilities on MFL Total number of facilities: All facilities including those to be added, with duplicate facilities removed
Facility visits Proportion of completed visits # Description Facilities requiring visit to complete missing information from MFL 13 14 Facilities requiring visit added from LGA list 15 Facilities requiring visit added from DHIS 2 list 16=(13+14+15) Facilities requiring visit - total 17 Facilities visited 18=(17/16) Proportion of completed visits Facilities to be visited: Theseeither are missing coordinates or have wrong coordinates.
Completed forms Deleted facilities # Description 19 Facilities to be deleted* 20 Verified forms for deleted facilities 21=(20/19) % of deletions documented Facilities to be deleted: Deletions documented
Completed forms Facilities to add or update # Description 22 Facilities to be added or updated 23 Verified forms for addition or update 24=(23/22) % of additions or updates documented Facilities to add or update: Updates or additions documented
Quality of forms % of complete forms # Description 25 Forms with updated information or new facilities 26 Forms with filled coordinates 27 Forms with 90% of fields completed 28 Forms with both filled coordinates and 90% of fields 29=(28/25) % of complete forms
Next steps Over the course of the 3-day training, will you be able to improve any of the following? % of deletions documented % of updates or additions documented % of complete forms
This presentation was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of MEASURE Evaluation cooperative agreement AID-OAA-L-14-00004. MEASURE Evaluation is implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with ICF International; John Snow, Inc.; Management Sciences for Health; Palladium; and Tulane University. Views expressed are not necessarily those of USAID or the United States government. www.measureevaluation.org