SECEP Michigan Data Workshop Insights
Dive into the SECEP Michigan Data Workshop insights from NCREST at Teachers College, Columbia University. Explore student survey data, college enrollment summaries, and staff perspectives for a comprehensive view of STEM and early college experiences. Gain valuable information on student demographics, coursework experiences, and college readiness plans, with a focus on unpacking student responses directly with students and staff.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
SECEP Michigan Data Workshop NCREST Teachers College, Columbia University Jennifer Kim Tina Siganporia Elisabeth Barnett Michigan Early Middle College Association (MEMCA) Conference August 2017
Last Time We Met March 2017 Workshop #1 Academic Mindsets and SECEP Michigan Student Voices What SECEP students say about STEM instruction and experiences, in relation to Academic Mindsets Growth, Relevance, Self-Confidence, Belonging Workshop #2 The SECEP Staff Survey, What It Means for Us Reviewed 8 survey item tables organized by SECEP design principle Looked at Year 1 vs Year 2 NCREST, August 2017 2
Todays Session 1. Student Survey data Student perspectives 2. College data summary Student enrollment in college courses and relevant subject areas 3. Staff Survey 2017 Teacher/staff perspectives NCREST, August 2017 3
Data Source #1 SECEP Student Survey (NCREST) What do our students say about their STEM and Early College experience?
2017 SECEP Student Survey SECEP participation April-May 2017 administration 21 schools (11 high schools, 10 middle schools) 2,694 students (counting only 50%+ completions) 12th Graders (N=1,155): 58% response rate; 47% last year 8th Graders (N=1,539): 72% response rate; 75% last year * Michigan 12th Graders: 67%; 65% last year * Michigan 8th Graders: 72%; 75% last year Key topics Demographics STEM experiences Coursework experiences Student supports College and career prep, plans Overall high school experience NCREST, August 2017 5
Questions for Consideration What are students experiences in college coursework/readiness and STEM? Overall? What surprised you the most? What trend are you hoping for in 2017-18? How can you unpack these topics/student responses directly with students and staff? NCREST, August 2017 6
Data Source #2 SECEP College Coursework Data (NCREST) Are our students experiencing early college and college readiness course-taking opportunities?
College Coursework Data 2013-14, 2014-15 college data 2015-16 college data, CTE data, AP data Demographic and grade level data all years Key items Number of students experiencing college courses Types of courses taken Performance in courses DE, CTE and AP: multiple ways for college readiness NCREST, August 2017 8
Questions for Consideration What are the college course-taking outcomes of students? How about in STEM? What can we anticipate from this past year s 2016-17 not yet collected college coursework? How about for this new 2017-18 school year and final SECEP year what are you anticipating and planning? NCREST, August 2017 9
Data Source #3 SECEP Staff Survey (SERVE) How do our faculty/staff experience STEM and Early College? What are their perspectives?
SECEP Staff Survey Spring 2015, 2016, 2017 Online survey was administered to: All SECEP high school staff (administrators, teachers, STEM teachers) Matched comparison high school principals (or designated staff) 2015 (N=451 SECEP, N=253 Michigan) 2016 (N=408 SECEP, N=247 Michigan) NCREST, August 2017 11
SECEP 2017 All Schools Report Topics Staff understanding of SECEP (Q2) College readiness implementation (Q4) Instructional practices (Q5) Academic and social supports (Q6) College partnership (Q14) Data use (Q16) Professional development/Coaching (Q17, Q18, Q19, Q20) SECEP effect (Q23) NCREST, August 2017 12
Questions for Consideration How do our school faculty/staff experience SECEP? How do their perspectives compare to student perspectives? NCREST, August 2017 13
Wrap-Up 1. What area(s) can my school prioritize and/or improve this 2017-18 school year re: STEM and college course-taking? 2. What is one concrete step or feature my school can take to consider these data more regularly in our continuous improvement planning? NCREST, August 2017 14
Contact Information Jennifer Kim jek51@tc.columbia.edu Tina Siganporia ts3067@tc.columbia.edu Elisabeth Barnett barnett@tc.columbia.edu NCREST, August 2017 15
