Significance of Diplomacy in State Relations
Diplomacy is the key method by which a state interacts with others, crucial for fostering relationships, resolving conflicts, and promoting mutual understanding. It plays a vital role in shaping global politics and maintaining peace among nations.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Meaning and importance of diplomacy Meaning and importance of diplomacy? diplomacy is whereby a state conducts relations with other state(s).
What is the role of the convention in relation to diplomacy? The Convention plays a crucial role by regulating the establishment of permanent bilateral diplomatic missions to represent the interests of the state and the protection of its nationals, and the privileges and immunities accorded to missions and their staff. What is the role of the convention in relation to diplomacy?
States are recognised as having authority over people, territory and therefore may exercise jurisdiction over recognise that certain people, things and events are entitled to immunity from the enforcement of local law: (a) foreign states and heads of foreign states (including public ships of foreign states); (b) armed forces of foreign states; (c) diplomatic representatives and consuls of foreign states; (d) international organisations things them. and events international within their law own does However,
State immunity: At an international level all sovereigns(states) were considered equal and independent. It would be inconsistent with this principle if one sovereign could exercise authority over another sovereign. There fore, state officials are immune from local jurisdiction. UN Convention on the Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property December 2004 State immunity: UN Convention on the Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property 2
Article 2(1)(b) of the UN Convention on the jurisdictional states defines a state to include: 1. Its various organs of government say, all branches of government including the legislature and judicial organs. 2. Constituent units of a federal state subdivisions of the state, which are entitled to perform acts in the exercise of the sovereign authority, --. 3. Agencies of the state or other entities extent that they are entitled to perform acts of sovereign authority of the state Its various organs of government. That is to 2. Constituent units of a federal state or political 3. Agencies of the state or other entities, to the
4.Representatives of the state acting in that capacity. authorised to represent a state, in its various manifestations, in respect of acts done by them on behalf of the state, and includes the head of state acting in his official capacity 4.Representatives of the state acting in that capacity. This covers all natural persons
Consent A state can always waive its immunity by consenting to proceedings, and do so in advance. But a contractual clause that the law of another state will govern a contract does not amount to consent to the jurisdiction of that state s courts. Consent
Commercial transactions At the heart of the modern restrictive approach is the principle that a state is not immune in respect of its commercial transactions Commercial transactions
Contracts of employment Unless otherwise agreed between the States concerned, a State cannot invoke immunity from jurisdiction before a court of another State -- which relates to a contract of employment between the State and an individual for work performed or to be performed, in whole or in part, in the territory of that other State. Contracts of employment
Absolute immunity: The traditional doctrine of state immunity was absolute in that immunity attached to all actions of foreign states.
Restrictive Theory immunity a distinction could be drawn between the public acts of states and private acts (trading and commercial acts. it would only be applicable to the public acts Restrictive Theory: Under a restrictive view of
Foreign armed forces Members of the armed forces usually enjoy limited immunities from local jurisdiction while in the territory of a foreign state. Obviously such immunities only apply where the forces are present with the consent of the host state. Foreign armed forces
Diplomatic immunity: Diplomatic immunity:
The establishment of diplomatic relations and permanent diplomatic missions requires the consent of both states be sovereign states and must recognise each other as such. Recognition is usually soon followed by the establishment of diplomatic relations, and sometimes the establishment of relations constitutes the act of recognition requires the consent of both states (Article 2). They must Recognition is usually soon followed by the establishment of diplomatic relations, and sometimes the establishment of relations constitutes the act of recognition.
The two states are known by the self- explanatory terms sending state and receiving state. The term diplomatic mission is generic. Most are called embassie titles such as Libyan People s Bureau between the fifty-three Commonwealth states, their diplomatic missions are, for historical reasons called high commissions and their ambassadors are high commissioners. terms sending state and receiving state. embassies, but some have Libyan People s Bureau. As high commissions, high commissioners.
The main functions of a diplomatic mission are described in Article 3(1): I. I. representing the sending state, II. II. protecting its interests and those of its nationals, III. negotiating with the receiving state, IV. reporting what goes on in the receiving state and promoting friendly relations, V. providing the local population with information about the sending state. representing the sending state, protecting its interests and those of its nationals, III. negotiating with the receiving state, IV. reporting what goes on in the receiving state and promoting friendly relations, V. providing the local population with information about the sending state.
The immunity of diplomatic mission The premises of the diplomatic mission, which include the embassy buildings and compound together with the residence of the head of the mission, are inviolable by virtue of Article 22 of the Vienna Convention. That means they are inaccessible to agents of the receiving state without the consent of the head of the mission. The immunity of diplomatic mission inviolable by virtue means they are inaccessible to agents of the receiving state without the consent of the head of the mission.
On 4 November 1979, following the revolution in Iran, a number of Iranian nationals seized the US Embassy and took the personnel inside hostage. Although the ICJ found that the initial hostage taking could not be attributed to the Iranian government, it had been aware of the threat posed to the embassy and had the means available to provide adequate protection. The court therefore found that Iran s failure to prevent the seizure of the embassy amounted to a breach of its international obligations that Iran s failure to prevent the seizure of the embassy amounted to a breach of its international obligations.
Diplomatic personnel The Vienna Convention provides for varying degrees of immunity which are dependent on the status of the person concerned. There are five main categories of person each attracting differing degrees of immunity: I. the head of the mission (the ambassador or d affaires II. II. the members of the diplomatic:(advisors) III. the members of the administrative and technical staff(staff( security staff); ; IV. the members of the service staff;( staff, porters and gardeners) V. private servants( those employed by sending state). Diplomatic personnel the head of the mission (the ambassador or charge d affaires); ); the members of the diplomatic:(advisors) the members of the administrative and technical staff(staff(registry, secretarial, communications and charge III. the members of the service staff;(drivers, kitchen IV. private servants( those employed by sending state). V.
The head of the mission and the members of the diplomatic staff are also referred to as diplomatic agents, and they receive the highest degree of immunity. Article 29 of the Vienna Convention provides that the person of a diplomatic agent shall be inviolable. He or she shall not be subject to any form of arrest or detention, and the receiving state has a duty to ensure his or her protection.
Article 31 further provides that diplomatic agents enjoy complete immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of the receiving state and extensive administrative jurisdiction. These immunities extend to the families of diplomatic agents if they are not nationals of the receiving state. immunity from civil and
Members of the administrative and technical staff and their families, provided they are not nationals of the receiving state, enjoy similar immunities to diplomatic agents apart from the fact that their immunity from civil and administrative jurisdiction does not extend to acts performed outside the course of their duties.
Members of the service staff who are not nationals of the receiving state enjoy immunity in respect of acts performed in the course of their duties.
Private servants who are not nationals of the receiving state only enjoy exemption from local taxation, unless there is specific agreement which extends their immunities
The foreign ministry of the receiving state must be notified, in advance where possible, of all appointments and of the arrivals and departures of members of the mission discharge of local staff must also be notified. Notifications should clearly indicate whether the person is a diplomatic agent, a member of the A&T staff or service staff by describing the post ( (e.g.first driver). Members of the family and private servants must also be notified. The foreign ministry of the receiving state must be notified, in advance where possible, of all appointments and of the arrivals and departures of members of the mission. The engagement and whether the person is a diplomatic agent, a member of the A&T staff or service staff by describing the post e.g.first secretary, communications officer, driver). Members of the family and private servants must also be notified. secretary, communications officer,
Persona non grata Article 9 confers on the receiving state the unqualified power to require the removal of any member of the mission. For a diplomatic agent the receiving state notifies the sending state that he is persona non grata, and for all other cases that he is not acceptable . The notification can be done at any time, even before the person s arrival in the receiving state. Persona non grata
What is the obligation of sending state The sending state is then obliged either to recall the person or to terminate his functions with the mission. If sending state refuses or fails to within a reasonable time, the receiving state can refuse to recognise him as a member of the mission so that he will no longer enjoy any privileges or immunities What is the obligation of sending state? refuses or fails to remove him no longer enjoy any privileges or immunities
Termination of privileges and immunities: When the functions of an entitled person have come to an end (i.e. he has ceased to be a member of staff of the mission), his privileges and immunities normally cease on his final departure from the receiving state (Article 39(1) and (2)). He is allowed a reasonable period in which to leave which the privileges and immunities continue, even in the case of an armed conflict. Termination of privileges and immunities: reasonable period in which to leave, during
Duties of the mission to the receiving state Several duties of the mission are set out in Article 41. First persons enjoying privileges and immunities have a duty to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving state. Secondly interfere in the internal affairs of the receiving stat Duties of the mission to the receiving state First, and most importantly, all have a duty to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving state. Secondly, members of a mission must not interfere in the internal affairs of the receiving state.
Thirdly state must be conducted with or through the foreign ministry of the receiving state, or such other ministry as may be agreed Lastly be used in any manner incompatible with the functions of the mission, such as for commercial purposes. hirdly, all official business with the receiving foreign ministry of the receiving state, or such other ministry as may be agreed. Lastly, the premises of the mission must not such as for commercial purposes.
Special missions A special mission is a temporary mission representing the state, which is sent by one state to another state with the consent of the latter for the purpose of dealing with it on specific questions or performing in relation to it a specific task Many special missions are sent to negotiate a bilateral or multilateral treaty Special missions temporary mission, specific task . sent to negotiate a bilateral or multilateral treaty
Consular immunity The primary function of consulates, vice consulates, and consular posts is to represent and deal with nationals of the sending state. The law relating to consular relations is contained in the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963 which entered into force in 1967. Consular immunity
Consular officials do not, however, enjoy complete immunity from the local criminal jurisdiction arrest or detention, save in the case of a grave crime, they can be subjected to criminal proceedings. Their immunity from civil and administrative jurisdiction only extends to acts performed in the exercise of consular functions. Consular officials do not, however, enjoy complete immunity from the local criminal jurisdiction. Although they are not liable to
Members of the consular staffs family do not enjoy significant immunities
International organizations: International organisations operate in particular states and will often require the same immunities and privileges as diplomatic missions if they are to carry out their functions effectively. The position of the UN is dealt with in the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN 1946. International organizations: