State Capture and Corruption in Southeast Europe: Challenges and Solutions
Geopolitics, state capture, and peak corruption in Southeast Europe pose significant challenges for anticorruption efforts. The integrity of governments in the region is under severe stress, with a high vulnerability to state capture. This article discusses the stalled momentum of anticorruption reforms, the influence of state capture on government rules, and the shortcomings in institutional infrastructure. It also highlights issues in public procurement and the need for more inclusive and transparent law drafting.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Geopolitics, State Capture and Peak Corruption: What Is Next for Anticorruption in Southeast Europe? Regional Anti-Corruption Forum 26 September 2022, Belgrade Ruslan Stefanov Program Director Center for the Study of Democracy
Zero hour: the war in Ukraine and the promise of enlargement Geopolitics of anticorruption: how to help when no help is (officially?) requested? Anticorruption should not slip from the agenda The integrity of WB governments remains under serious stress. Stalled momentum of anticorruption reforms. State capture is influencing drafting, adoption and enforcement of government rules and regulations. Yet, neither the Western Balkan anticorruption strategies nor EC s assessment reports address it.
Corruption pressure: up it goes again SELDI Corruption Monitoring System, 2021.
Official documents abound, unlike results AC strategies in the late 2010s are not updated, new ones are rarely developed. Existing documents are of general nature, with no government commitments to measurable targets. New laws in the WB countries are now increasingly targeting sophisticated forms of corruption (conflict of interest, lobbying, origin of assets). However, law drafting is not sufficiently inclusive and transparent.
Problems in the institutional infrastructure of anticorruption Broad-mandated anticorruption institutions are vulnerable to: o being overwhelmed by the complexity and scope of their enforcement tasks; o being captured by special interests. Hundreds of referrals/reports/investigations a handful of convictions. Lack of relevant and reliable enforcement information, needed to identify the reasons for this discrepancy. CSOs are among the few running engines of anticorruption, but used as a token (check-box) of inclusiveness rather than a respected stakeholder.
Public procurement: a high-risk zone High share of restricted procedures. Frequent use of emergency procedures, especially during the pandemic. Using lowest price as main criterion is prone to abuse (best price-quality ratio criterion rarely used). In cases of strategic interest contractors of public works are awarded preferential treatment.
Media capture and anticorruption Dominant role of oligarchs in domestic media -> low media freedom. Failure of watchdog function ( nothing happens even if corrupt politicians are exposed in media ). Editorial independence is compromised. Media biases -> result from high levels of political polarisation. Intimidation of journalists for anticorruption reporting.
Turning the tide: how to regain the anticorruption momentum Prioritise the dismantling of state capture, and abandon the formula if government is the problem, government should be the solution . Tackle illicit finance flows (dirty money that crosses an international border, illegally earned, moved, or used) Target media capture, using the European parliament drive Measure effect of evidence-based anticorruption policies, not intentions. Focus on outputs (actual impact) not inputs (regulations, procedures, resources).
Thank you! www.seldi.net Ruslan.Stefanov@CSD.BG
