State of Facilities - Office of Asset Management
In this document, Eric Haukdal from the Department of Energy's Office of Asset Management provides insights into the state of facilities in MA-50. The information presented is critical for effective management and decision-making regarding the assets under their purview.
Uploaded on Feb 15, 2025 | 2 Views
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Department of Energy State of Facilities Eric Haukdal MA-50 Office of Asset Management 1 of 53
Overview This discussion highlights the Department s status in regards to the following performance measure areas: 1. Inventory DOE s real property holdings 6. Disposition The degree to which DOE identifies and disposes of excess property 2. Alignment The degree to which real property assets are linked to core capabilities and mission requirements 7. Management How well DOE invests in and maintains real property in a sustainable and cost effective manner 3. Functionality Adequacy of real property assets to support operations 8. Data Reliability Completeness and accuracy of real property data used to support and inform real property asset decisions 4. Condition Level of repair of real property assets 5. Utilization The degree to which DOE activities are using existing space 2 of 53
1 - Inventory Overview Measure: Inventory Purpose: To provide info about the Department s real property holdings and to serve as a normalizing factor for additional measures Calculations: Buildings & Trailers: Total Gross/Rentable Sqft of Assets OSFs: Total RPV of Assets Land: Total Acreage of Assets 3 of 53
1 - Inventory Active/Inactive Buildings & Trailers GSF of Active/Inactive Buildings & Trailers Almost 17% of all buildings and trailers are currently inactive (by square footage) Some notable annual changes include: - 2015: 7.6M ft2 Paducah site transferred from an inactive NE site to an active EM clean-up site - 2016: 3M ft2at NNSA s Kansas City Security Campus moved from blank Status (presumed active) to Undergoing Stabilization (inactive) and - 2016: 8M ft2 at EM s Portsmouth Gaseous facility moved from blank to Undergoing Stabilization For Both "Active" & "Inactive" Data: Sum of Gross Rentable Sqft Fiscal Year = applicable FY Property Type = Building or Trailer For "Active" Data: Status = Operating, Outgranted, Standby, or (Blank) For "Inactive" Data: Status <> Operating, <> Outgranted, <> Standby, and <> (Blank) 4 of 53
1 - Inventory Active/Inactive OSFs RPV of Active/Inactive OSFs Compared to Buildings and Trailers, there are much fewer inactive OSFs (just 7% of overall OSF portfolio by RPV) Steady increase is primarily a result of inflation since sites update RPV s on a regular basis For Both "Active" & "Inactive" Data: Sum of RPV Fiscal Year = applicable FY Property Type = OSF For "Active" Data: Status = Operating, Outgranted, Standby, or (Blank) For "Inactive" Data: Status <> Operating, <> Outgranted, <> Standby, and <> (Blank) 5 of 53
1 - Inventory Active/Inactive Land Acres of Active/Inactive Land Under 3% of land assets (by acreage) are inactive Slight by steady decrease in acres of land over the past five years For Both "Active" & "Inactive" Data: Sum of Acreage Fiscal Year = applicable FY Property Type = Land For "Active" Data: Status = Active Land or Blank For "Inactive" Data: Status <> Active Land and <> (Blank) 6 of 53
1 - Inventory Owned/Not-Owned Buildings & Trailers GSF of Owned/Not-Owned Buildings & Trailers Amount of owned square footage steady over the past five years Noticeable increase in non- owned buildings & trailers in 2014 but mostly due to adding square footage data to existing assets: - MA added 2.3M ft2 by populating the FIMS database with GSF data for existing properties - NNSA added about 2.1M ft2 but almost all was a result of updating GSF data for existing facilities - EM added about 811K ft2 of which about 682K ft2 was from updating GSF data for existing facilities. For Both "Owned" & "Not-Owned" Data: Sum of Gross Rentable Sqft Fiscal Year = applicable FY Property Type = Building or Trailer For "Owned" Data: Ownership = DOE Owned (O) or (Blank) For "Not Owned" Data: Ownership <> DOE Owned (O) and <> (Blank) 7 of 53
1 - Inventory Owned/Not-Owned OSFs RPV of Owned/Not-Owned OSFs Almost all OSFs are owned by the DOE (over 99.9%) Steady increase is primarily a result of inflation since sites update RPV s on a regular basis For Both "Owned" & "Not-Owned" Data: Sum of RPV Fiscal Year = applicable FY Property Type = OSF For "Owned" Data: Ownership = DOE Owned (O) or (Blank) For "Not Owned" Data: Ownership <> DOE Owned (O) and <> (Blank) 8 of 53
1 - Inventory Owned/Not-Owned Land Acres of Owned/Not-Owned Land A large portion of DOE s land is not owned by DOE but, rather, withdrawn from the public domain Over 90% of that withdrawn land is associated with just two sites: - NNSA s National Nevada Security Site (866K acres of withdrawn land) - NE s Idaho National Lab Scoville site (504K acres withdrawn land) For Both "Owned" & "Not-Owned" Data: Sum of Acreage Fiscal Year = applicable FY Property Type = Land For "Owned" Data: Ownership = (Blank) or DOE Owned (O) For "Withdrawn" Data: Ownership = Withdrawn Land (W) For "Not Owned" Data: Ownership <> DOE Owned (O), <> Withdrawn Land (W), & <> (Blank) 9 of 53
2 - Alignment Overview Measure: Alignment Index Purpose: To show the degree to which real property assets are linked to core capabilities and mission requirements Calculations: Gross SqFt of Assets with Core Capability Identified Buildings & Trailers: X 100 Total Gross SqFt RPV of Assets with Core Capability Identified OSFs: X 100 Total RPV Acreage of Assets with Core Capability Identified Land: X 100 Total Acreage 10 of 53
2 Alignment Alignment Index Gross SqFt of Assets with Core Capability Identified X 100 Total Gross SqFt Alignment Index Operating Buildings & Trailers Metric only applies to Operating assets since in- active assets would not be expected to fulfill a mission need Core Capability established by the LOB as an optional field in 2013 New 430.1C (section 4a(1)(f)) established this as a required field as of Aug 2016 For Both "GSF of Core Capability ID'd" & "Total GSF" Data: Sum of Gross/Rentable Sqft Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Building or Trailer Status = Operating or (Blank) For "GSF of Core Capability ID'd" Data: Primary Capability <> (Blank) 11 of 53
2 Alignment Alignment Index Alignment Index Operating OSFs Alignment Index Active Land For "RPV of Core Capability ID'd Column" & "Total RPV": Sum of RPV Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = OSF Status = Operating or (Blank) For "RPV of Core Capability ID'd" Data: Primary Capability <> (Blank) For "Acreage of Core Capability ID'd" & "Total Acreage" Data: Sum of Acerage Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Land Status = Active Land or (Blank) For "Acreage of Core Capability ID'd" Data: Primary Capability <> (Blank) 12 of 53
2 - Alignment Non-Aligned Assets Non-Aligned B&T Non-Aligned OSFs Non-Aligned Land For "Non-Aligned Building and Trailer" Data Sum of Gross/Rentable Sqft Fiscal Year = 2016 Program Office = applicable PO's Property Type = Building or Trailer Status = Operating or (Blank) Primary Capability = (Blank) For "Non-Aligned OSF" Data Sum of RPV Fiscal Year = 2016 Program Office = applicable PO's Property Type = OSF Status = Operating or (Blank) Primary Capability = (Blank) For "Non-Aligned Land" Data Sum of Acreage Fiscal Year = 2016 Program Office = applicable PO's Property Type = Land Status = Active Land or (Blank) Primary Capability = (Blank) 13 of 53
3 - Functionality Overview Measure: Functionality Index Purpose: To show the degree to which assets are adequately supporting operations Calculations: Gross SqFt of Assets with Overall Asset Condition = Adequate Buildings & Trailers: X 100 Total Gross SqFt RPV of Assets with Overall Asset Condition = Adequate OSFs: X 100 Total RPV 14 of 53
3 Functionality Functionality Index Gross SqFt of Assets with Overall Asset Condition = Adequate X 100 Total Gross SqFt Functionality Index Active & Assessed B&T First began collecting Overall Asset Condition data in 2014 for DOE Laboratory facilities only Assessment results reported via the Overall Asset Condition FIMS data field The August 2016 update to DOE Order 430.1C (section 4c(10)) requires functional assessments for all assets (not just Labs anymore) Since this is still a new data field, the data set continues to evolve as more sites conduct assessments. Until we reach a more steady state, the year- to-year trends are not likely accurate. For Both "Adequate Gross Sqft" and "Total Gross Sqft" Data: Sum of Gross/Rentable Sqft Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Building or Trailer Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby For "Adequate Gross Sqft" Data: Overall Asset Condition = Adequate For "Total Gross SqFt" Data: Overall Asset Condition = Adequate, Substandard, or Inadequate 15 of 53
3 Functionality Functionality Index RPV of Assets with Overall Asset Condition = Adequate X 100 Total RPV Functionality Index Active & Assessed OSFs For Both "Adequate RPV" and "Total RPV" Data: Sum of Gross/Rentable Sqft Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = OSF Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby For "Adequate RPV" Data: Overall Asset Condition = Adequate For "Total RPV" Data: Overall Asset Condition = Adequate, Substandard, or Inadequate 16 of 53
3 Functionality Number of Assets Assessed for Functionality Number of Assets Assessed vs. Not Assessed Number Assessed vs. Not Assessed by Program For Both "Total Assessed" and "Total Not Assessed" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Building, Trailer, or OSF Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby For "Assessed" Data: Overall Asset Condition = Adequate, Substandard, or Inadequate For "Not Assessed" Data: Overall Asset Condition = (Blank) For "Assessed" and "Not Assessed" Columns: Fiscal Year = 2016 Program Office = applicable PO's Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby Property Type = Building, Trailer, or OSF For "Assessed" Column: Overall Asset Condition = Adequate, Substandard, or Inadequate For "Not Assessed" Column: Overall Asset Condition = (Blank) 17 of 53
3 Functionality Assessed vs. Not-assessed - EM & PA Functionality Index Active & Assessed OSFs For "Assessed" and "Not Assessed" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Program Office = applicable PO's per chart Property Type = Building, Trailer, or OSF Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby For "Assessed" Data: Overall Asset Condition = Adequate, Substandard, or Inadequate For "Not Assessed" Data: Overall Asset Condition = (Blank) 18 of 53
4 - Condition Overview Measure: Condition Index Purpose: To provide insight into the level of repair needed to bring real property assets structures and systems back to their original physical condition or specifications (i.e. back to good working order) Calculation: Applies to Buildings, Trailers, and OSFs: Repair Needs 1 X 100 Total RPV 19 of 53
4 Condition Condition Index Repair Needs 1 X 100 Total RPV Condition Index All Buildings and Trailers Condition Index All OSFs For Both "Repair Needs" & "Total RPV" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Building or Trailer For "Repair" Needs Data: Sum of Repair Needs For "Total RPV" Data: Sum of RPV For Both "Repair Needs" & "Total RPV" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = OSF For "Repair" Needs Data: Sum of Repair Needs For "Total RPV" Data: Sum of RPV 20 of 53
4 Condition Condition Index by Program Office Condition Index by Program Office For Both "Repair Needs" & "Total RPV" Data: Fiscal Year = 2016 Program Office = as applicable For "Repair Needs" Data: Sum of Repair Needs For "Total RPV" Data: Sum of RPV 21 of 53
5 - Utilization Overview Measures: Portfolio Utilization Index and Office Occupancy Rate Purpose: To show the degree to which the Department is using existing space Calculations: (apply to Buildings & Trailers only) Office Occupancy Rate Portfolio Utilization Index Sum across all assets: Util-Office Usable SF Util-Asset % Utilized x Asset Gross/Rentable Sqft X 100 Total No of Occupants Total Portfolio Gross/Rentable Sqft or n i=1 (Util-Asset % Utilized) x (Asset Gross/Rentable Sqft) i i X 100 Total Portfolio Gross/Rentable Sqft Where 1 to n is the set of all assets in the portfolio 22 of 53
5 Utilization Portfolio Utilization Index Sum across all assets: Util-Asset % Utilized x Asset Gross/Rentable Sqft X 100 Total Portfolio Gross/Rentable Sqft Portfolio Utilization Index The fluctuations are due more to significant changes in FIMS data quality rather than to changes in actual utilization levels For example, In 2014, MA reported its total square footage for the first time (over 2M Gross ft2) but didn t start reporting its Asset % Utilized until 2016 For Both "Utilized GSF" & "Total GSF" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby Property Type = Building or Trailer For "Utilized GSF " Data: Sum of Utilized SqFt Note: UtilizedGSF = (Util-Asset% Utilized 100 x Gross/Rentable SqFt) For "Total GSF" Data: Sum of Gross/Rentable SqFt 23 of 53
5 - Utilization Office Usable Square Feet 24 of 53
5 Utilization Office Occupancy Rate Util-Office Usable SF Total No of Occupants Office Occupancy Rate Only started collecting data about usable office space for the first time in 2014, and data does not yet appear complete for all assets in FIMS. So this measure does not yet provide an accurate reflection of the Department s actual Occupancy Rate since the numbers are based on limited data For "Total Office Usable Sqft" & "Total No. of Occupants" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY per row Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby Util-Office Usable SF <> (Blank) For "Office Usable Sqft" Data: Sum of Util-Office Usable SF For "Total Number of Occupants" Data: Sum of Total No of Occupants Number of Occupants in Identified Usable Office Space: 92,514 Total Occupants across the DOE: 144,786 Percent of Occupants in identified usable office space: 64% 25 of 53
6 - Disposition Overview Measures: Excess Property Index and Excess Disposition Index Purpose: To show the degree to which the Department is holding and disposing of excess property Calculations: Excess Property Index Excess Disposition Index Gross/Rentable Sqft of Assets with Excess Facility Indicator = Y Gross/Rentable Sqft of Assets Archived in the Reporting Year Buildings & Trailers: X 100 X 100 Total Gross/Rentable Sqft Total Gross/Rentable Sqft RPV of Assets RPV of Assets with Excess Facility Indicator = Y Archived in the Reporting Year OSFs: X 100 X 100 Total RPV Total RPV Acreage of Assets Archived in the Reporting Year Acreage of Assets with Excess Facility Indicator = Y Land: X 100 X 100 Total Acreage Total Acreage 26 of 53
6 Disposition Excess Property Index Gross/Rentable Sqft of Assets with Excess Facility Indicator = Y X 100 Total Gross/Rentable Sqft Excess Property Index Buildings and Trailers Shows how much excess property DOE currently has in its portfolio Bump in 2016 is a result of some large buildings being declared excess during that year: - EM Portsmouth Gaseous Site, Process Building: over 2.5M ft2 declared excess - NNSA's Kansas City National Security Campus Site, Manufacturing Building: over 3.5M ft2 For Both "GSF of Excess Property" & "Total GSF" Data: Sum of Gross/Rentable SqFt Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Building or Trailer For "GSF of Excess Property" Data: Excess Indicator = Y 2016 bump likely larger since it doesn t include some EM Portsmouth and Paducah assets that were deactivated between 2015 and 2016 but are not yet declared excess in FIMS. 27 of 53
6 Disposition Excess Property Index RPV of Assets with Excess Facility Indicator = Y X 100 Total RPV Excess Property Index OSFs Large increase in 2016 due to some large OSFs being declared excess during the year: - Office of River Protection: Single Shell Tank Farm over $450M - Savannah River Site: Multiple OSF Assets over $600M combined - East Technology Park: Multiple OSF Assets over $200M combined 2016 bump likely larger since it doesn t include some EM Portsmouth and Paducah assets that were deactivated between 2015 and 2016 but are not yet declared excess in FIMS. For Both "RPV of Excess Property" & "Total RPV" Data: Sum of RPV Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = OSF For "RPV of Excess Property" Data: Excess Indicator = Y 28 of 53
6 Disposition Excess Property Index Acreage of Assets with Excess Facility Indicator = Y X 100 Total Acreage Excess Property Index Land For Both "Acreage of Excess Property" & "Total Acreage" Data: Sum of Acreage Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Land For "Acreage of Excess Property" Data: Excess Indicator = Y 29 of 53
Gross/Rentable Sqft of Assets Archived in the Reporting Year 6 Disposition Excess Disposition Index X 100 Total Gross/Rentable Sqft RPV of Assets Archived in the Reporting Year X 100 Total RPV Excess Disposition Index Buildings & Trailers Excess Disposition Index OSFs For "GSF of Assets Archived" Data: Sum of Archived Gross/Rentable Sqft Archived Disposition Year = applicable FY's Archived Property Type = Building or Trailer Archived Disposition Method <> Admin Correction/No Disposal For "Total GSF" Data: Sum of Gross/Rentable SqFt Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = Building or Trailer For "RPV of Assets Archived" Data: Sum of Archived RPV Archived Disposition Year = applicable FY's Archived Property Type = OSF Archived Disposition Method <> Admin Correction/No Disposal For "Total RPV" Data: Sum of RPV Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Property Type = OSF 30 of 53
6 Disposition Current Excess Property by Excess Declaration Date 2016 Excess Property (B&T) by Declaration Date For "Declared Excess" Data: Sum of Gross/Rentable SqFt Fiscal Year = 2016 Excess Year = applicable year per row Property Type = Building or Trailer Excess Indicator = Y 31 of 53
7 - Management Overview Measures: Deferred Maintenance Index and Maintenance Investment Index Purpose: To show the degree to which the DOE invests in and maintains real property in a sustainable and cost effective manner Calculations: Maintenance Investment Index Deferred Maintenance Index Buildings, Trailers, & OSF s Deferred Maintenance Annual Actual Maintenance X 100 X 100 RPV RPV 32 of 53
7 Management Maintenance Investment Index Annual Actual Maintenance X 100 RPV DOE s target is to spend 2%- 4% of RPV in maintenance each year (per National Research Council Publication Committing to the Cost of Ownership , 1990) While some individual assets may achieve the 2-4% range, the Department as a whole is consistently below that target Eventually looking to replace this metric with Maintenance Budget Index - Compares Annual Actual Maintenance to Annual Required Maintenance - Tailors measure to actual, identified requirements - Eliminates cookie cutter 2-4% approach Maintenance Investment Index Target: Maintenance = 2% - 4% of RPV For Both "Annual Actual Maint" & "RPV" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Ownership = DOE Owned (O) Status = Operating, (Blank), Outgranted, or Standby For "Annual Actual Maintenance" Data: Sum of Annual Actual Maintenance For "RPV" Data: Sum of RPV 33 of 53
7 Management Deferred Maintenance Index Deferred Maintenance X 100 RPV Increase in 2014 largely due to significant increase in DM at Savannah River Site (over $400M increase in DM) Deferred Maintenance Index Decrease in 2015 also primarily a result of changes at Savannah River Site but NOT due to changes in DM... Instead, due to large increases in RPV for some assets: - Canyon Bldg $2.7B RPV increase - Reactor Bldg $8.0B RPV increase - Vitrification Bldg $2.6B increase For Both "Deferred Maint" & "RPV" Data: Fiscal Year = applicable FY's Ownership = DOE Owned (O) For "Deferred Maintenance" Data: Sum of Deferred Maintenance For "RPV" Data: Sum of RPV DM Trend In Actual $ (not indexed) 34 of 53
8 Data Reliability Overview Measure: Data Reliability Index Purpose: To show the degree to which DOE s real property data is accurate and complete Calculation: Number of Green FIMS Validation Scorecards X 100 Total Number of Scorecards 35 of 53
8 Data Reliability Data Reliability Index Number of Green FIMS Validation Scorecards X 100 Total Number of Scorecards Data Reliability Index 36 of 53
8 Data Reliability Data Reliability Index by Category 37 of 53
8 Data Reliability Green, Red, Yellow Scorecards for Owned Assets Most common causes for Red scorecards include: - Lack of source documentation to verify facility repair needs, deferred maintenance, and actual maintenance - Lack of condition assessments performed in the past5 years 38 of 53
SOFAR Developed a draft State of Facilities Annual Report (SOFAR) in April Focuses on the eight performance areas and contains many of the charts in this presentation plus additional narrative Will provide the draft to the Facilities and Infrastructure Steering Committee in June for review and comment 39 of 53
Questions? Contact Info Eric Haukdal eric.haukdal@hq.doe.gov 202.287.1317 40 of 53
Bonus Info! The following slides provide additional DOE statistics about buildings/trailers, OSFs, land, and number of employees sliced and diced many different ways 41 of 53
DOE Stats Buildings & Trailers Buildings & Trailers by Ownership Type Ownership Type Quantity SqFt $ RPV DOE Owned (O) Contractor Leased (C) 11,293 255 115,580,732 81,557,472,026 7,799,064 1,123,830 596,459 2,742,623,039 20,512,750 110,544,384 Permit (P) DOE Leased (D) 157 56 GSA Leased (L) GSA Owned (G) 35 25 3,189,608 3,069,308 0 0 Contractor License (E) 4 0 0 0 63,939 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Federal Permit (N) Contractor Owned (T) DOE License (B) 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Recipient Owned (R) Totals Totals 11,825 11,825 131,422,940 131,422,940 84,431,152,199 84,431,152,199 42 of 53
DOE Stats Buildings & Trailers Buildings & Trailers by Program Program Office # of Buildings & Trailers Program Office Gross/ Rentable SqFt Program Office Replacement Plant Value (RPV) $ 37,055,548,887 NNSA 4,079 EM 41,668,430 NNSA EM 3,335 NNSA 40,656,078 EM 26,862,239,962 SC 1,763 SC 27,795,642 SC 12,098,369,246 PA 1,493 NE 5,807,640 NE 3,773,223,133 NE 367 PA 5,265,314 NR 2,297,931,212 NR 334 NR 3,878,439 FE 493,594,556 FE 268 MA 2,424,272 PA 1,283,262,447 EE 78 FE 1,650,001 EE 509,871,080 LM 39 EE 1,306,610 LM 32,492,353 EA 38 FERC 592,414 EA 12,813,354 MA 16 LM 201,386 RW 8,217,011 FERC 11 EA 137,552 MA 3,588,957 RW 3 RW 23,402 FERC 0 IN 1 IN 15,760 IN 0 Totals Totals 11,825 11,825 Totals Totals 131,422,940 131,422,940 Totals Totals 84,431,152,199 84,431,152,199 43 of 53
DOE Stats Buildings & Trailers Buildings & Trailers Top Ten Sites # of Buildings & Trailers Gross/Rentable SqFt Replacement Plant Value (RPV) ($) 19,017,928,307 Site Site Site Savannah River Site 1,261 Portsmouth Gaseous 10,135,691 Savannah River Site Los Alamos National Laboratory 941 Savannah River Site 9,072,437 Los Alamos National Laboratory 11,532,783,520 SNL - New Mexico 800 Los Alamos National Laboratory 8,569,021 Y-12 National Security Complex 7,828,796,176 Richland Operations Office 737 Paducah Gaseous 8,025,583 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 4,701,180,281 Pantex Plant 621 Y-12 National Security Complex 7,608,823 SNL - New Mexico 4,140,975,448 Idaho National Lab-Scoville 493 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 6,624,201 Idaho National Lab-Scoville 3,681,140,141 Nevada National Security Site 415 SNL - New Mexico 6,529,114 Pantex Plant 3,471,571,628 Fermi Natl Accelerator 411 Richland Operations Office 6,050,575 Portsmouth Gaseous 2,691,518,152 Y-12 National Security Complex 389 Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10) 5,556,883 Argonne Natl Lab-Site D 2,380,995,266 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 376 Argonne Natl Lab-Site D 5,310,576 Brookhaven National Laboratory 2,369,707,543 Top-Ten Total: Top-Ten Total: 6,444 6,444 Top-Ten Total: Top-Ten Total: 73,482,904 73,482,904 Top-Ten Total: Top-Ten Total: 61,816,596,461 61,816,596,461 DOE Total: DOE Total: 11,825 11,825 DOE Total: DOE Total: 131,422,940 131,422,940 DOE Total: DOE Total: 84,431,152,199 84,431,152,199 44 of 53
DOE Stats OSFs OSFs by Ownership Type Ownership Type Quantity $ RPV DOE Owned (O) Permit (P) Contractor Leased (C) 8,288 56,562,779,533 433,510 3,011,966 67 12 DOE Leased (D) Non-Federal Permit (N) 3 0 6,163,848 0 Contractor Owned (T) Contractor License (E) Grant Recipient Owned (R) DOE License (B) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals Totals 8,371 8,371 56,572,388,857 56,572,388,857 45 of 53
DOE Stats OSFs OSFs by Program Program Office EM Program Office EM # of OSFs $ RPV of OSFs 3,086 14,039,040,195 NNSA 2,033 NNSA 14,123,194,804 PA SC 1,267 820 SC FE 9,993,286,001 7,010,148,884 NR NE 296 287 NR NE 6,485,363,274 2,398,380,728 LM FE 259 238 LM RW 1,564,521,408 589,560,000 EE EA 63 17 PA EE 288,214,768 61,515,603 RW FERC 5 0 EA FERC 19,163,192 0 IN MA 0 0 IN MA 0 0 Totals Totals 8,371 8,371 Totals Totals 56,572,388,857 56,572,388,857 46 of 53
DOE Stats OSFs OSFs Top Ten Sites Site # of OSFs Site $ RPV of OSFs Savannah River Site Nevada National Security Site 1,220 742 KAPL - Kesselring Savannah River Site 6,012,940,619 5,255,608,263 Paducah Gaseous Los Alamos National Laboratory 703 506 Y-12 National Security Complex Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10) 3,680,194,540 4,874,504,799 South Region Idaho National Lab-Scoville 421 380 Brookhaven National Laboratory Idaho National Lab-Scoville 2,861,248,948 2,836,412,854 Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10) East Region East Tennessee Technology Park North Region 332 311 279 243 Los Alamos National Laboratory 2,832,091,170 West Hackberry Facility Office of River Protection Bryan Mound Facility 2,402,804,747 2,259,261,448 2,074,932,833 Top-Ten Total: Top-Ten Total: DOE Total: DOE Total: 5,137 5,137 8,371 8,371 Top-Ten Total: Top-Ten Total: DOE Total: DOE Total: 35,090,000,221 35,090,000,221 56,572,388,857 56,572,388,857 47 of 53
DOE Stats Land Land By Ownership Type Ownership Type # of Parcels Acres Withdrawn Land (W) DOE Owned (O) 64 1,494,200 705,803 770 Permit (P) Easement (A) 330 460 246,317 260,439 Institutional Ctrl (I) DOE Leased (D) 96 66 32,311 9,139 Other (H) 124 13 8,842 639 Contractor Leased (C) License (E) 80 131 Long Term Interest (T) DOE License (B) Non-Federal Permit (N) Grant Recipient Owned (R) 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals Totals 2,007 2,007 2,757,821 2,757,821 48 of 53
DOE Stats Land Land By Program Program Office Program Office # of Parcels Acres PA LM 1,311 363 NNSA EM 1,118,452 598,088 NNSA SC 116 104 NE PA 569,179 248,869 EM FE 46 31 RW LM 74,758 89,093 NE EE 13 11 SC FE 44,038 9,019 RW NR 7 3 NR EA 4,294 1,379 EA FERC 2 0 EE 653 FERC 0 IN MA 0 0 IN MA 0 0 Totals Totals 2,007 2,007 Totals Totals 2,757,821 2,757,821 49 of 53
DOE Stats Land Land - Top Ten Sites (excludes Power Admin sites) Site # of Parcels Site Acres SNL - New Mexico Argonne Natl Lab-Site D 64 33 Nevada National Security Site Idaho National Lab-Scoville 867,011 569,135 Uranium Lease Site Fernald, OH, Site 31 30 Richland Operations Office Savannah River Site 374,862 198,046 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Monticello, UT, Disposal and Processing Sites 26 30 SNL - Nevada Civilian Radioactive Waste Management 179,200 74,758 Rifle, CO, Disposal/Processing Site Weldon Spring, MO, Site 24 22 Oak Ridge Office Los Alamos National Laboratory 33,453 25,277 Pinellas County, FL, Site Crescent Junction Site 15 15 Uranium Lease Site Pantex Plant 25,137 17,603 Top-Ten Total: Top-Ten Total: DOE Total ( DOE Total (including PA): ): 290 290 Top-Ten Total: Top-Ten Total: DOE Total ( DOE Total (including PA): ): 2,364,482 2,364,482 2,757,821 2,757,821 2,007 2,007 50 of 53
