Strategic Insight on Selection Practices Impacting Firm Performance

validity of selection procedures n.w
1 / 24
Embed
Share

Discover the strategic value of selection practices and their impact on firm performance through a study conducted with South Korean firms in various industries. The study reveals valuable insights on the alignment between environmental factors, HR practices, and the role of selection procedures in managing turnover rates.

  • Selection practices
  • Firm performance
  • Strategic value
  • HR practices
  • Environmental factors

Uploaded on | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Validity of Selection Procedures Aaliyah Bey & Danielle Russell

  2. Strategic Value of Selection Practices Kim & Ployhart, 2018 How can selection create competitive advantage?

  3. What is selection? Definition: Selection determines the acquisition and deployment of human capital resources

  4. Competitive Environment External Internal Industry growth Industry dynamism Prior firm performance Collective turnover

  5. Hypothesis Firms with more collective turnover use fewer selection practices than those with less turnover.

  6. The Study 413 South Korean firms 3 industries: Manufacturing (283) Finance (28) Non-Finance Service (102)

  7. The Study (cont.) Survey data from HCCP Financial Performance data Data goes back from 2004

  8. The Study (cont.) Surveyed HR managers regarding their company s HR practices Selection practices listed Value = Operating Profit Per Employee

  9. Results Hypothesis supported If a firm has high turnover, it is more valuable to use less selection practices

  10. Takeaways Greater alignment between environmental factors and HR practices = greater performance External and internal factors should be taken under consideration when structuring a Selection Process. If a company finds itself with high turnover rates, it should scale back on selection practices

  11. TRANSPARENCY OF ASSESSMENT CENTERS: LOWER CRITERION- RELATED VALIDITY BUT GREATER OPPORTUNITY TO PERFORM? By Ingold, Kleinmann, Konig, & Melchers

  12. Key Terms Transparency: The degree applicants are informed about dimensions that are being assessed Impression Management (IM):Process in which people attempt to influence the perceptions of other people Self promotion Ingratiation

  13. What is Criterion-Related Validity? The strength of the relationship between a measure (predictor) and its ability to predict the scores of another (criterion) Concurrent Predictive

  14. What is an Assessment Center (AC)? Place that evaluates an individual s potential to perform behaviors relevant to the most critical aspects of a job.

  15. Purpose Understand the effects dimension transparency has on: ACs validity Relationship between IM and job performance Fairness perceptions of the assessment center

  16. Hypotheses 1. Ratings from a non-transparent AC are more valid in predicting performance than a transparent AC 2. Self-promotion in the non-transparent AC will be more positively related to supervisor-rated job performance than in the transparent AC 3. Perceived opportunity to perform is higher in the transparent AC than in the non- transparent AC.

  17. The Study Simulated an AC Participants: 194 Assessees 73 Assessors 3 Facilitators

  18. Measures AC performance 5 point scale Job performance 7 point scale IM & opp. to perform 5 point scale Cognitive ability Manipulation check

  19. Results

  20. Results Cont. Perceived Opportunity to Perform Transparent Non-transparent Mean 3.30 3.26 SD .52 .60

  21. Key Takeaway Hiring managers should not use highly transparent ACs ACs should not disclose the dimensions they test on

  22. Group Takeaway It s complex!

More Related Content