Targeted Improvement Plans in Education System

2015 - 2016 Campuses Rated Improvement Required (IR) and Formerly Improvement Required (FIR) Targeted Improvement Plans Public Hearing Presented by: Ann Smisko, Ph.D. Deputy Superintendent Charles Chernosky, Ph.D. Director, Federal and State Compliance

Targeted Improvement Plans According to TEC 39.106(e) and TAC 97.1063(i) for each year a campus is assigned an unacceptable performance rating, a campus intervention team (CIT) shall: Continue to work with the campus until the campus satisfies all performance standards Assist in updating a targeted improvement plan to analyze areas of growth and areas that require improvement 2

Targeted Improvement Plans According to TEC 39.106(e-1) and TAC 97.1063(j) with the completion of the plan, the board shall: Conduct a hearing for the purpose of notifying the public of the plan Solicit public comment on the targeted improvement plan Submit the targeted improvement plan to the commissioner for approval 3

IR 1 (13 Campuses) with Targeted Improvement Plans A. S. Johnston ES John F. Peeler ES Daniel Webster ES Leonides Cigarroa ES Eduardo Mata ES Mt. Auburn ES G.W. Truett ES Paul Dunbar ES Gabe Allen ES San Jacinto ES J.W. Carpenter ES William B. Miller ES Harold Lang MS 4

Multi-Year IR Campuses with Targeted Improvement Plans Multi-Year IR 24 Campuses IR 3 C.F. Carr ES IR 4 IR 2 J.W. Ray ES J.N. Bryan ES Maria Moreno LC Mark Twain ES Oran Roberts ES R. McNair ES Rufus Burleson ES Umphrey Lee ES Wilmer-Hutchins ES Boude Storey MS E.H. Cary MS O.W. Holmes MS South Oak Cliff HS T.W. Browne MS Edward Titche ES Elisha M. Pease ES IR 5 Nancy Cochran George W. Carver LC Annie Blanton ES Billy Dade MS Roger Q. Mills ES Sarah Zumwalt MS Thomas Edison MS 5

Formerly Improvement Required with Targeted Improvement Plans FIR - 19 Campuses Bayles ES Clara Oliver ES Ebby Halliday ES Frederick Douglass ES J.N. Ervin ES Jack Lowe ES John F. Kennedy ES L.L. Hotchkiss ES Onesimo Hernandez ES Hector Garcia MS David Carter HS Emmett Conrad HS Franklin D. Roosevelt HS H. Grady Spruce HS L.G. Pinkston HS Lincoln HS W.W. Samuell HS Wilmer-Hutchins HS Barbara Manns EC 6

Highlights of Goals, Problems, and Causes within Targeted Improvement Plans Goal: Increase Student Achievement in Reading, Writing, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Needs: Increase Teacher Training in Content Pedagogy and Alignment Provide Instructional Support and Feedback for Teachers in the Written, Taught, and Tested Curriculum Improve the use of Data in Instructional Planning 7

Intervention Highlights Key Interventions Professional Development on Curriculum Alignment, Instruction, and Assessment Tiered Professional Development by Instructional Coaches and Principals for Teachers Purposeful Feedback on Aligned Instruction (what s taught and what s tested) from Principals and Instructional Coaches Effective Assessment Analysis to inform Instructional Practice in the Classroom Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) that focus on improving Instruction in the Classroom Tiered Groups (based on the data) with interventions for students 8

2015-2016 Public Hearing Campuses Rated Improvement Required (IR) and Formerly Improvement Required (FIR) Q&A 9 9