Teacher Induction Program Promoting CSTP Growth and Reliability
Explore the success of a Teacher Induction program in promoting the growth of new teachers through CSTP assessments. Discover how the program ensures high reliability and validity in assessing teaching practices. Candidates report significant growth in CSTP levels, with a focus on enhancing knowledge and skills.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
CSTP GROWTH OVER TIME
Teacher Induction PROMOTES GROWTH One of the main goals of Teacher Induction is to enhance the knowledge and skill of new teachers which is evidenced by CSTP growth. Data collected over two years from the teacher candidates and their mentors demonstrates that our program is fulfilling this goal! Sinclair Research Group 2
Reliability & Validity To what extent did you examine evidence of classroom practice and reflect with your mentor and together come up with the CSTP Self-Assessment placement? OUR RESULTS SHOW HIGH RELIABILITY & VALIDITY See below chart from page 8 of the report, The standard deviation below 1.0 indicates the results are reliable and valid. Sinclair Research Group 3
CSTP Levels on Continuum of Teaching Practice Emerging 1. 2. Exploring 3. Applying 4. Innovating 5. Integrating (level not used in Induction) Sinclair Research Group 4
Candidates Reported Greatest Growth in CSTP 3.1 at the Top General Education Yr 1 Current Competence Mean SD CSTP 3.1 CSTP 6.7 CSTP 5.4 CSTP 2.2 CSTP 5.3 CSTP 2.3 CSTP 2.1 CSTP 4.2 CSTP 6.1 CSTP 6.3 CSTP 5.2 CSTP 2.6 CSTP 3.2 CSTP 4.1 CSTP 6.2 CSTP 3.4 CSTP 1.6 CSTP 5.6 CSTP 4.5 CSTP 3.6 CSTP 2.4 CSTP 2.5 CSTP 6.6 CSTP 5.1 CSTP 1.1 CSTP 3.3 CSTP 3.5 CSTP 1.2 CSTP 4.3 CSTP 1.4 CSTP 1.3 CSTP 2.7 CSTP 5.5 CSTP 5.7 CSTP 6.4 CSTP 4.4 CSTP 1.5 CSTP 6.5 3.69 3.69 3.66 3.65 3.64 3.64 3.62 3.59 3.58 3.58 3.57 3.56 3.56 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.53 3.52 3.52 3.48 3.47 3.47 3.46 3.44 3.44 3.43 3.42 3.41 3.41 3.40 3.39 3.38 3.37 3.37 3.31 3.30 3.25 3.13 0.68 0.62 0.55 0.84 0.68 0.90 0.73 0.57 0.70 0.76 0.69 0.85 0.64 0.71 0.76 0.72 0.71 0.75 0.72 0.75 1.02 0.92 0.81 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.72 0.84 0.95 0.74 0.77 0.92 1.01 0.88 0.93 0.88 0.87 1.03 Sinclair Research Group 5
GENERAL EDUCATION Insert change chart by Element for Gen Ed Sinclair Research Group 6
This chart shows the CSTP growth at the HOLISTIC LEVEL Sinclair Research Group 7
General Education Overall, these groups of exiting second year teachers believe that they grew an average of 0.8 levels in the Elements with minimum growth 0.4 and highest growth at 1.14. OVER ONE FULL LEVEL OF GROWTH. Highest Growth CSTP 2.5 Sinclair Research Group 8
Education Specialist Year 2 & ECO HIGHEST GROWTH- CSTP 2.5 Education Specialist Yr 2 & ECO Current Competence CSTP 2.5 CSTP 2.6 CSTP 2.3 CSTP 4.3 CSTP 4.4 CSTP 4.5 CSTP 5.2 CSTP 5.6 CSTP 6.1 CSTP 6.2 CSTP 1.3 CSTP 1.4 CSTP 1.6 CSTP 2.1 CSTP 2.2 CSTP 2.7 CSTP 3.1 CSTP 3.3 CSTP 4.1 CSTP 4.2 CSTP 6.3 CSTP 6.6 CSTP 6.7 CSTP 5.4 CSTP 5.7 CSTP 1.1 CSTP 1.5 CSTP 2.4 CSTP 3.2 CSTP 3.4 CSTP 3.5 CSTP 3.6 CSTP 6.4 CSTP 5.1 CSTP 5.3 CSTP 1.2 CSTP 6.5 CSTP 5.5 CSTP 5.5 Education Specialist Yr 2 & ECO Current Competence CSTP 2.5 CSTP 2.6 CSTP 2.3 CSTP 4.3 CSTP 4.4 CSTP 4.5 CSTP 5.2 CSTP 5.6 CSTP 6.1 CSTP 6.2 CSTP 1.3 CSTP 1.4 CSTP 1.6 CSTP 2.1 CSTP 2.2 CSTP 2.7 CSTP 3.1 CSTP 3.3 CSTP 4.1 CSTP 4.2 CSTP 6.3 CSTP 6.6 CSTP 6.7 CSTP 5.4 CSTP 5.7 CSTP 1.1 CSTP 1.5 CSTP 2.4 CSTP 3.2 CSTP 3.4 CSTP 3.5 CSTP 3.6 CSTP 6.4 CSTP 5.1 CSTP 5.3 CSTP 1.2 CSTP 6.5 Mean Mean SD SD 4.25 4.13 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.75 3.75 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.50 3.50 3.43 3.40 3.25 3.25 4.25 4.13 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.75 3.75 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.50 3.50 3.43 3.40 0.71 0.64 0.58 1.22 0.89 0.71 0.82 0.82 0.71 0.71 1.07 0.69 0.69 0.69 1.07 0.69 0.84 0.84 1.30 1.30 0.45 1.10 1.10 1.26 0.50 0.76 0.95 1.11 1.14 1.14 0.55 0.89 0.55 0.58 1.00 0.98 0.89 0.96 0.96 0.71 0.64 0.58 1.22 0.89 0.71 0.82 0.82 0.71 0.71 1.07 0.69 0.69 0.69 1.07 0.69 0.84 0.84 1.30 1.30 0.45 1.10 1.10 1.26 0.50 0.76 0.95 1.11 1.14 1.14 0.55 0.89 0.55 0.58 1.00 0.98 0.89 Sinclair Research Group 9
EDUCATION SPECIALIST Insert change chart by Element for Education Specialist Sinclair Research Group 10
This chart shows the CSTP growth at the HOLISTIC LEVEL Sinclair Research Group 11
Education Specialist Overall, these groups of exiting second year teachers believe that they grew an average of one full level in the Elements with a range of minimum of .28 and a maximum of 1.35. Highest Growth is CSTP 2.5 at mean of 4.25 Sinclair Research Group 12
Overall Conclusions at Element Level- Gen Ed Year 2 & ECO Year Two and ECO: When change over the induction period is examined, these exiting second year and ECO teachers believed they had grown an average of 0.81 levels with a range of .40-1.14. The Elements where evidence points to the most growth (above 1.0) were: CSTP 2.5 Developing, communicating, and maintaining high standards for individual and group behavior CSTP 2.6 Employing classroom routines, procedures, norms, and supports for positive behavior to ensure a climate in which all students can learn Sinclair Research Group 13
Overall Conclusions at Holistic Level- Gen Ed Year 2 & ECO Year Two and ECO: When examined from the Holistic level, these exiting second year and ECO teachers believe they have grown over a full level in all six CSTP (average growth was 1.05 levels). The most change over time came in CSTP 6: Developing as a Professional Educator (1.16)and CSTP 1: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning (1.15). Standard deviations were normal. Sinclair Research Group 14
Overall Conclusions at Element Level- Year 2 Ed. Specialists Year Two and ECO: When change over the induction period is examined, these exiting second year and ECO Education Specialist teacher candidates believed they had grown an average of one full level (range .25-1.38). Four Elements (CSTPs 2.6, 2.5, 5.2, 5.6) were at 1.25 or above growth. Clearly the lowest rated growth area was CSTP 5.5. Sinclair Research Group 15
Overall Conclusions at Holistic Level-Year 2 Ed. Specialists Year Two and ECO: When examined from the Holistic level, these exiting second year and ECO teachers believe they have grown at least a full level in all CSTP. The highest growth levels were report in CSTP 6: Developing as a Professional Educator; a full 1 1/2 levels). Standard deviations showed that respondents marked themselves more similarly than they did in their current competence ratings. Sinclair Research Group 16
DATA SHOW THAT TEACHER CANDIDATES IN OUR PROGRAM ARE SHOWING VERY STRONG PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AS RESULT OF THEIR PARTICIPATION IN INDUCTION Sinclair Research Group 17
