UW Program Fees Proposal for Enhancing Student Value and Academic Success
Explore the UW Program Fees Proposal presented at the Board of Trustees meeting, focusing on simplifying fee structures, maintaining academic standards, and improving student success. The proposal aims to replace outdated fees, increase transparency, cover existing fees, and enhance resources for student success. Detailed breakdown of proposed fees for various programs and the estimated revenues generated are also discussed.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
UW Program Fees Proposal UW Board of Trustees Meeting November 16, 2017 Laramie, WY
WHYPROGRAMFEES? To Simplify replace over 120+ individual course and miscellaneous fees that have not been updated in 3+ years. To be more transparent to students and parents on fee assessment. The fairest means to maintain academic standards while striving to ensure student success.
WHYPROGRAMFEES? Focus on two objectives: 1. Recognize and cover all existing fees (including ghost fees ) to maintain program quality. 2. Enhance value to students. by improving resources for university student success, retention, graduation rate, and improving career success skills.
ELEMENTS Enhancing value to students: Each program fee includes a common advising fee of $6/credit hour. new professional advising program/model expansion in success service efforts on campus improvements in career exploration, planning, development, and placement services.
PROPOSEDPROGRAMFEES Engineering: Business: A&S: Agriculture: Education: ENR/Haub: Health Science $31/credit hour $26/credit hour $9-$31/credit hour $21/credit hour $28/credit hour $26/credit hour $12-$27/credit hour Fees assessed to students registered in all 4000 and lower course codes (on-campus courses only) based on the college and department the course is offered by. Fees will not be assessed on staff taking tuition-waiver courses.
PROPOSEDPROGRAMFEES Figure 1: Proposed Program Fees, Summer 2017 $35 $31 $31 $30 $28 Total Prgram Fee (Advising + Program Fee) $27 $26 $26 $25 $21 $20 $25 $25 $22 $21 $20 $20 $15 $12 $15 $9 $10 $6 $3 $5 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $0 Arts and Science (non-Sci-Q) A&S Science and Agriculture Sci-Q A&S Visual and Performing Arts (VPA) Business Education Engineering Haub School of ENR Health Sciences Tier 1 (Social Work, WIND) Health Sciences Tier 2 (K&H, Comm. Dis., Nursing) Advising Fee ($6.00) Program Fee
ESTIMATEDREVENUES Total Program fee revenue: $4.5 million Revenues to support academic programs: $3.2 million Note: existing course fees being replaced = $1.8 million Requested cost increases in March 2016 would have increased this to $2 million. Net increase is estimated to be $1.2 million without consideration of ghost fees. Advising, student success and career preparation support: $1.3 million Strategic plan: increase 1st 2nd year retention to 80% (currently 76%), increase 4 and 6-year graduation rates. New plan requires 20.5 new FTE in professional advisor/counseling support.
STUDENTIMPACT Average impact on students across all majors is $226/semester. Range of impacts Low = humanities: average semester increase is $108/semester High = music: average semester increase of $368/semester Engineering average impact is $272/semester. These impacts account for replaced fees. The average percentage increase is 5.6%*. *Assumes 48% of students are resident, and 52% non-resident
STUDENTREACTION A student survey on the proposal was sent to all undergraduate students. Results: A majority of students in all colleges indicated the proposed fees would pose a moderate, little or no cost to them. By college, less than a fifth to just over a quarter of students indicated they thought fees would impact them a lot or a great deal of cost. Less than 1/3 of all students were opposed to the program fee proposal. The largest number (47.4%) answered maybe to the question of whether they were in favor, and over 20% answered they were in favor without reservation. Despite the fact the proposal calls for higher costs to students, opposition to fees was limited.
STUDENTREACTION ASUW Resolution in support of program fees passed unanimously on October 31.
PROCESSESRULES Review of fees process Recommend annual evaluation at college, university and Trustee level. Student involvement in process. Assessment of fee goals and outcomes must occur and show success or fees eliminated. Uses of fees/prohibitions Only for use in student services, undergrad program support. Cannot be used for permanent faculty salary, research support, or as general university revenue.
FINAL STEPS September-October 2017 Student and faculty comment ASUW presentation Online survey mechanism made available to students to comment on proposed fees October 2017: final report made available on proposed fees Student and faculty comment November 2017: Final proposal to Trustees If approved, implementation begins fall 2018
