When is it used?

When is it used?
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This content delves into civil forfeiture procedures, such as seizing property, filing complaints, and establishing innocence defenses. It also discusses scenarios for utilizing civil forfeiture, like cases involving unopposed forfeitures, defendants who are deceased or fugitives, and more. Real-life cases, like the Prevezon/Magnitsky case and the Doraville Properties seizure, provide insight into the practical application of civil forfeiture laws.

  • Civil forfeiture
  • Legal procedures
  • Asset seizure
  • Criminal law
  • Prevezon case

Uploaded on Apr 30, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workshop 20 NCB Forfeiture: What is it; When is it used? Stef Cassella Jeff Simser Evelyn Sheehan 1

  2. Civil Forfeiture Procedure Seize the property File a complaint Send notice Claimant files a claim; Discovery Motions / trial Claimant must establish standing Government must establish forfeitability Claimant must establish innocent owner defense 2

  3. When to use civil forfeiture 1. Forfeiture unopposed 2. Defendant dead or incompetent 3. Fugitive or foreign national 4. Statute of limitations 5. Wrongdoer unknown 6. Convicted of a different crime 7. Convicted in another court 8. Interests of justice 9. Standard of proof 10. Defendant used third party s property 11. Delay in the criminal case 3

  4. Prevezon / Magnitsky Case Proceeds of Russian Fraud Apartments in New York 4

  5. United States v. Prevezon Holdings, Ltd., 251 F.Supp.3d 684 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) 3 shell companies at 2 Russian banks 14 shell companies at 9 Russian banks 4 shell companies Bank de Economii (Moldova) Bank de Economii (Moldova) 2 shell companies Bank Krainy Sever (Russia) NZ company Danske Bank (Estonia) BVI company Danske Bank (Estonia) BVI Prevezon Holdings UBS Switzerland company Ukia Bank (Lithuania) 5

  6. Abacha $ 4 Billion 6

  7. United States v. All Assets Held in Account Number 80020796 (Doraville Properties), 299 F. Supp.3d 121 (D.D.C. 2018) Jersey $287 Million Doraville Properties Corporation 7

  8. Senders Bank United States v. All Wire Transactions Involving Dandong Zhicheng Metallic Material Co., Correspondent Bank in New York 2017 WL 3233062 (D.D.C. May 22, 2017) Chinese Bank Chinese Bank Chinese Company 8

More Related Content