Academic Career Progression Guidelines for Brain Sciences Faculty at UCL

faculty of brain sciences school of life n.w
1 / 11
Embed
Share

Explore the detailed process and criteria for academic promotions in the Faculty of Brain Sciences at University College London (UCL). Learn about application requirements, promotion panels, and the Academic Career Framework for research staff. Find templates and essential guidelines to support early career promotions to Grades 7 & 8.

  • UCL
  • Brain Sciences
  • Academic Promotions
  • Career Progression
  • Research

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FACULTY OF BRAIN SCIENCES School of Life and Medical Sciences FACULTY OF BRAIN SCIENCES Early Career Staff Promotion to Grades 7 & 8

  2. Faculty of Brain Sciences Early Career Promotions Panel 2021 David Shanks (Deputy Dean), Chair Maria Chait (Ear Institute) Mariya Moosajee (Institute of Ophthalmology) Helene Plun-Favreau (Institute of Neurology) Gill Livingston (Psychiatry) Sophie Scott (Psychology & Language Sciences) Christine Gaston (support) UCL Promotions Committee advised by SLMS Promotions Committee

  3. How to complete an application How to complete an application Templates can be found at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-sciences/about-faculty/working- faculty/career-progression-and-development/academic-promotions-processes-0 CV (uses same template as Senior Promotions) Self-Assessment outlining how the candidate meets the criteria for promotion for the relevant grade, according to the Academic Career Framework (max 2 pages) Publication List, if relevant Faculty Regrading Request Form which must include o Cost code and confirmed financial approval (Institute/Division) o Date of last appraisal o Head of Research Department approval (signature) o Institute/Division Director s approval (signature) o Supporting statement/reference provided by candidate s immediate line manager (IMPORTANT)

  4. Using the Academic Career Framework: Research Using the Academic Career Framework: Research Staff on research contracts: promotion to Research Fellow (Grade 7) & Senior Research Fellow (Grade 8) Progression through the above grades might be expected to be attained by demonstrating an ability to meet: the threshold research criteria at the next level; and several of the core and/or specialist research criteria at the next level; and at least the threshold education criteria or some of the criteria in either of the two other domains (enterprise and external engagement; institutional citizenship) at the next level.

  5. UCL ACADEMIC CAREERS FRAMEWORK: RESEARCH Grade 7 Threshold: an individual on this grade will demonstrate detailed understanding and knowledge of the subject and contemporary research activities within it. All research outputs are available through Open Access wherever possible. Core: Plan and develop independent, original, significant and rigorous contributions to subject area or body of knowledge Build networks of research contacts around discipline and/or relevant cross-disciplinary communities Presentation of work to collaborators or others external to UCL

  6. UCL ACADEMIC CAREERS FRAMEWORK: RESEARCH Grade 8 Threshold: an individual on this grade will demonstrate establishing oneself as an individual with the ability and potential to produce internationally-excellent independent, original, significant and rigorous research contributions to a subject area or body of knowledge. All research outputs are available through Open Access wherever possible. Core: Effective supervision and mentoring of PhD students Publish research findings and proposals Disseminate research findings at conferences and similar Participate in research-related enabling activities, for instance adding value to a cross-disciplinary network, journal reviewing National and/or international engagement Engagement with UCL Public Policy strategic activities e.g. policy round tables, the production of Research Insights briefings; the production of policy-focused outputs; evidence of building networks or partnership with policy stakeholders; testimonials from policy professionals; adopting co-production methods

  7. Senior Research Fellow (G8) successful applications Senior Research Fellow (G8) successful applications As the majority of the applications are for promotion to SRF (grade 8), here is a list of common features of those successful applicants: Normally at least 6 years of post-doc research experience prior to applying for promotion Likely to be Principal Investigators on grants Likely to hold or have held an early-career fellowship or similar Active in supervising a team of researchers (PhD and technicians), as well as BSc and MSc students Have a suitable publication record including impactful outputs, with a number of 1st authored papers Regularly invited to international meetings and major national meetings Demonstrate at least some knowledge transfer and teaching activity

  8. Using the Academic Career Framework: Teaching Using the Academic Career Framework: Teaching Staff on teaching contracts: promotion to Senior Teaching Fellow (Grade 8) Progression through the above grades might be expected to be attained by demonstrating an ability to meet: the threshold education criteria at the next level; and several of the core and/or specialist education criteria at the next level; and at least the threshold research criteria or some of the criteria in either of the two other domains (enterprise and external engagement; institutional citizenship) at the next level.

  9. UCL ACADEMIC CAREERS FRAMEWORK: EDUCATION Grade 7 Threshold: an individual on this grade will demonstrate successful contribution to the development of a subject s teaching programme, with particular emphasis on the relationship between research and education. All teaching activity is of a consistently high standard. Core: Translating advances in the subject area into own teaching delivery Use of a range of appropriate technologies, and providing timely and effective feedback to students Demonstrate inclusive teaching practices

  10. UCL ACADEMIC CAREERS FRAMEWORK: EDUCATION Grade 8 Threshold: an individual on this grade will demonstrate evidence of successful participation in education activity with students at any level, and of engagement with the implications of current research for programme delivery and design. All teaching activity is of a consistently high standard. Core: Significant contribution to curriculum planning and course design to ensure excellence and student learning, including through collaborative working as required Significant contribution to education-related enabling activities, for instance teaching committees, exam boards, admissions Proactive and effective engagement with education development and student-centred issues through relevant committees Effective management of teaching staff and other delegated education resources Successful course delivery at taught graduate level Engagement with the Connected Curriculum initiative, demonstrating impact Supporting students as a personal tutor

  11. Common pitfalls across all applications Common pitfalls across all applications The panel can only assess the application based on what is written in the application and on the CV, so it is important to target the criteria clearly and comprehensively. Entire career history will be relevant but strength of career trajectory (particularly from date of last promotion) must be demonstrated and will be the main point of consideration by the Panel. The publications list should include all publications, as well as clearly listing the top 5 for consideration; listing papers which are submitted or in press but not yet published isn t useful for this process. The panel can t take into consideration grants listed which are submitted but not yet awarded. Make sure the Line Manager supporting statement is comprehensive and shows strong support cross-referencing the criteria.

Related


More Related Content