Bibliometric Evaluation of Institutes at Czech Academy of Sciences
This publication discusses the utilization of bibliometrics for evaluating research institutes within the Czech Academy of Sciences. It delves into the importance and implications of using bibliometric analysis as a tool for the assessment of scholarly impact and research performance in academic settings. The author, David Jilosar, provides insights into how bibliometrics can be leveraged to measure and compare the scientific output and influence of different research institutions within the Czech Academy of Sciences.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Use of bibliometrics for the evaluation of institutes at the Czech Academy of Sciences David Ji losar
Role of libraries in evaluation of scientific institutions Established, prestigious institution with access to data about scientific production Bibliometric neutral Administration of CRIS system, management and cleansing of data about scientific production Human resources Citation databases
Bibliometrics as a background for evaluation Evaluations of institutions and teams in CAS in period 2010-2014 was splited into two phases. Phase one: Evaluation of choosen outputs Phase two: Evaluation of all outputs and analysis on national level
Used indicators Number of outputs Times Cited Journal quartile Quartile by citations Quality of citations Number of authors
Acquirement of data List of outputs from teams and from CRIS ASEP Citation data from Web of Science Journal data from WoS JCR and from ScimagoJR Connections through identifiers UT WOS and ISSN Articles, Proceedings papers and Reviews only
Calculations and tools Suitable tools are programming languages Python or R. For partial controls MS Excel/Calc can be used. It is possible to do whole calculations in MS Excel/Calc and notepad.
Improvements for next evaluation Removal of Quality of citations Parcialization of citations between autors Improved calculation of Quartile by citations
Thank you for your attention Slosar@lib.cas.cz