Evaluation Results of Africa Higher Education Centres of Excellence Project
Workshop evaluation results for the Africa Higher Education Centres of Excellence (ACE) Project from 2014 to 2019 are presented, including attendance and survey response rates, feedback on various aspects such as collaboration with institutions, national governments, and the World Bank, as well as overall project satisfaction trends.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
AFRICA HIGHER EDUCATION CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE AFRICA HIGHER EDUCATION CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE (ACE) PROJECT (ACE) PROJECT ACE WORKSHOPS Workshop Evaluation Results 2014 2019 By Jonathan C. Mba Director of Research & Programmes / ACE Coordinator
ATTENDANCE & SURVEY RESPONSE RATES Attendance and Survey Response Rates 500 100% 450 90% 400 80% 350 70% 300 60% 250 50% 200 40% 150 30% 100 20% 50 10% 0 0% ABUJA - May 2014 YAOUNDE - Nov 2014 BANJUL - May 2015 COTONU - Nov 2015 ACCRA - May 2016 ABIDJAN - Nov 2016 LAGOS - May 2017 Ouaga - May 2018 Djibouti Feb 2019 Number of participants Number of people who responded to the survey Survey reponse rate
FEEDBACK ON AAU Feedback on AAU 4.4 4.2 4 Feedback Rate 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3 ABUJA YAOUNDE BANJUL COTONOU ACCRA ABIDJAN LAGOS OUAGA DJIBOUTI Collaboration with institutions and national regulatory agencies 3.5 3.93 4 3.95 3.8 3.75 3.84 3.85 4 Timeliness and adequacy of technical support and guidance in preperation for Project Implementation 3.5 3.88 3.98 3.81 3.75 3.74 3.77 3.95 3.85 Responsiveness to queries 3.62 3.88 3.98 3.75 3.8 3.87 3.88 3.97 3.92 Facilitation and role in workshops and meetings 4 4.15 4.01 4.13 4.1 4.16 4.14 4.04 4.05 Overall facilitation of project Implementation 3.5 3.98 4 3.97 4 4.02 4.09 4.01 4.02
FEEDBACK ON NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS Feedback on Governments 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.5 Feedback Rate 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 ABUJA YAOUNDE BANJUL COTONOU ACCRA ABIDJAN LAGOS OAGA DJIBOUTI Overall Facilitation of Project Implementation 3.5 3.13 3.6 3.59 3.8 3.68 3.74 3.77 3.99 Provision of timely and adequate information 3 3.15 3.6 3.56 3.75 3.54 3.73 3.8 3.86 Responsiveness to inquiries 3.5 3.08 3.5 3.58 3.8 3.62 3.75 3.72 3.91
FEEDBACK ON WORLD BANK FEEDBACK ON WORLD BANK 4.3 4.1 3.9 3.7 Feedback Rate 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 ABUJA YAOUNDE BANJUL COTONOU ACCRA ABIDJAN LAGOS OUAGA DJIBOUTI Educational and Academic advice for Implementation 4 3.85 4 3.85 3.78 3.94 3.99 4.06 4.02 Providing timely and adequate Information 3.5 3.85 3.99 3.78 3.79 3.82 3.97 4.01 3.95 Responsiveness to Inquiries 3.5 4 4.1 3.74 3.82 3.94 4.08 4.08 4.07 Support with Procurement in terms of procedures , rules and budgeting 3 3.89 4 3.72 3.59 3.83 3.88 3.92 3.93
ACE PROJECT SATISFACTION ACE PROJECT SATISFACTION TREND 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 Satisfaction Rate 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3 ABUJA YAOUNDE BANJUL COTONU ACCRA ABIDJAN LAGOS OUAGA DJIBOUTI I Feel Proud of Being Part of this Project 4.5 3.6 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 I am Satisfied with the Implementation Progress 3.5 4.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.3
FEEDBACK ON LOGISTICS Feedback on Logistics 5 4.5 Logistics Feedback Rate 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 YAO UND E COT ONO U ABUJ A BANJ UL ACCR A ABID JAN LAG OS OUA GA DJIB OUTI Efficiency of travel arrangements 3 2.25 3 3.76 4 4.16 4.13 4.18 4.05 Airport pickup and local shuttle service 3 2.75 3.75 4.03 4 4.13 3.29 4.45 4.16 Hotel Accommodation 3.5 3.75 4 3.78 3.95 3.99 4.25 3.87 3.88 meeting venue 4 4.1 4.1 4.06 4.5 4.55 4.54 4.27 3.62 Overall Organization of the lunch 4 3.8 4.05 4.01 4.1 4.31 4.21 4.3 3.87
POTENTIAL IMPLEMENTAION RISKS IMPLEMENTATION RISK 3.7 3.5 3.3 Risk Rate 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 ABUJA YAOUNDE BANJUL COTONOU ACCRA ABIDJAN LAGOS OUAGA DJIBOUTI Unclear Information regarding project implementation 3 3 3 3.11 3.12 2.9 3.07 2.87 2.77 Insufficient faculty to scale up activities 3.5 2.85 2.95 2.96 3 2.77 2.94 3.07 2.75 Faculty motivation to undertake the activities 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.54 3.5 3.28 3.44 3.29 3.29 Lack of regional partnerships 3.5 3.05 3 2.86 3 3.08 3.06 3.06 2.85
POTENTIAL IMPLEMENTATION RISKS ACE Implementation Risks 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 Implementation Risk Rate 3.2 3 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 ABUJA YAOUNDE BANJUL COTONOU ACCRA ABIDJAN LAGOS OUAGA DJIBOUTI Slow and cumbersome approval process in the university 3.5 2.9 3.1 3.35 3.25 3.08 3.63 3.13 3.19 Slow and cumbersome approval process in the national review committee 3.5 3.5 3.85 3.28 3.35 3.07 3.36 3.18 3.28 Slow and cumbersome approval process in the World Bank 3.5 3 3.1 3.08 3.1 3.01 2.92 3 3.17 Corruption and abuse of funding 3.5 2.8 2.85 2.56 2.5 2.39 2.35 2.54 2.34
POTENTIAL IMPLEMENTATION RISKS Average Implementation Risk 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 Risk Rate 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 ABUJA YAOUNDE BANJUL COTONOU ACCRA ABIDJAN LAGOS OUAGA DJIBOUTI Average risk 3.44 3.06 3.17 3.09 3.1 2.95 3.1 3.1 2.9
CONCLUSION Positives National governments rate is improving on most indicators. WB has highest rating on responsiveness to queries and overall facilitation and support. AAU has highest rating on facilitation and role in workshops and meetings. Areas of improvements AAU could improve on timeliness and adequacy of technical support and timelines of responsiveness to queries WB improved on procurement but this is still lowest WB rating
CONCLUSION Project implementation summary Project implementation risk is lowest. Most ACEs are satisfied with implementation progress. Slow and cumbersome approval process still a risk
MERCI BEAUCOUP THANK YOU