Evolution of Soundfield for Classrooms - Impactful Findings Revealed
Explore the evolution of soundfield technology in classrooms and the significant impact on student learning. Discover how the MARRS Project findings showed improved test scores and cost savings, paving the way for inclusive education practices.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ListenPoint ListenPoint Evolution of Soundfield for Classrooms Dave Ellison Ellison Northwest & Listen Technologies
National Diffusion Network founded 1974 First Federal program to identify new education concepts
1978 MARRS Project initiated under NDN Identified that approximately 30% in grades 3-6 have hearing loss failing a 15 dB hearing screening
1978 MARRS Project initiated under NDN Identified that approximately 30% in grades 3-6 have hearing loss failing a 15 dB hearing screening Study of students with mild or minimal hearing loss to evaluate soundfield as a means to keep them in the mainstream instead of Special Education programs
1978 MARRS Project initiated under NDN Identified that approximately 30% in grades 3-6 have hearing loss failing a 15 dB hearing screening Study of students with mild or minimal hearing loss to evaluate soundfield as a means to keep them in the mainstream instead of Special Education programs Divided into groups with and without amplification
MARRS Project Findings: Test scores improved 10% - 30% over unamplified rooms!
MARRS Project Findings: Test scores improved 10% - 30% over unamplified rooms! Significant cost savings over special programs
MARRS Project Findings: Test scores improved 10% - 30% over unamplified rooms! Significant cost savings over special programs Eliminates the stigma for students for Special Ed
1982 next MARRS study Found improved scores in spelling tests among 131 children 2nd and 3rd grade with and without hearing loss
1982 next MARRS study Found improved scores in spelling tests among 131 children 2nd and 3rd grade with and without hearing loss First time a negative was identified students with a minimal hearing loss were viewed by the teacher as impulsive, overactive and having a weak attention span
1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists
1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists 25 words played recorder at 12 feet from students
1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists 25 words played recorder at 12 feet from students Normal hearing kids: 91% accuracy in testing
1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists 25 words played recorder at 12 feet from students Normal hearing kids: 91% accuracy in testing Hearing loss kids: 81% accuracy in testing
Recorder moved to CENTER of room Normal hearing kids increased to 98%
Recorder moved to CENTER of room Normal hearing kids increased to 98% Hearing loss kids increased to 96%!!
Recorder moved to CENTER of room Normal hearing kids increased to 98% Hearing loss kids increased to 96%!! When amplified, both groups tested at 98%
1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield
1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but
1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined
1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial
1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial 90% of administrators found the system beneficial
1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial 90% of administrators found the system beneficial Why? Fewer teacher absences due to fatigue and laryngitis
1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial 90% of administrators found the system beneficial Why? Fewer teacher absences due to fatigue and laryngitis Overall improved student test scores
1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs
1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day
1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day 75% of primary-level LD students had a measurable hearing loss
1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day 75% of primary-level LD students had a measurable hearing loss Children with developmental disabilities in primary school made significantly fewer errors in word identification in soundfield
1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day 75% of primary-level LD students had a measurable hearing loss Children with developmental disabilities in primary school made significantly fewer errors in word identification in soundfield Overall, children were observed to be more relaxed and responded more quickly in the amplified classroom environment
1993 children in 12 classrooms were identified with ongoing hearing loss and chronic ear problems
1993 children in 12 classrooms were identified with ongoing hearing loss and chronic ear problems Teachers, unaware of the target students, completed Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk in Secondary Student (SIFTER) forms for 6 rooms amplified and 6 rooms not amplified
1993 children in 12 classrooms were identified with ongoing hearing loss and chronic ear problems Teachers, unaware of the target students, completed Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk in Secondary Student (SIFTER) forms for 6 rooms amplified and 6 rooms not amplified SIFTER screening identified 30% of students with a hearing loss based solely on the SIFTER forms further confirming results
1994 ESL students studied in amplified vs non-amplified ESL students experienced significant difficulty in non-amplified classrooms in understanding spoken English
1994 ESL students studied in amplified vs non-amplified ESL students experienced significant difficulty in non-amplified classrooms in understanding spoken English Significant improvement in understanding spoken English when the students were placed in an amplified classroom
1994 ESL students studied in amplified vs non-amplified ESL students experienced significant difficulty in non-amplified classrooms in understanding spoken English Significant improvement in understanding spoken English when the students were placed in an amplified classroom MARRS project ended in 1995 when funding was cut off to NDN
2001 No Child Left Behind Act soundfield goes mainstream picks up where MARRS left off
2001 No Child Left Behind Act soundfield goes mainstream picks up where MARRS left off Mass deployment of inexpensive but somewhat limited products flooded schools to realize the benefits of soundfield
2001 No Child Left Behind Act soundfield goes mainstream picks up where MARRS left off Mass deployment of inexpensive but somewhat limited products flooded schools to realize the benefits of soundfield To learn more about Listenpoint please visit my booth today
Assistive Listening Systems For the Hearing Impaired Americans With Disabilities Act Title III
ADA Title III Eliminates physical barriers to accessibility
ADA Title III Eliminates physical barriers to accessibility Includes wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking stalls, door widths, counter heights all barriers to accessibility