Evolution of Soundfield for Classrooms - Impactful Findings Revealed

Download Presenatation
listenpoint listenpoint evolution of soundfield n.w
1 / 59
Embed
Share

Explore the evolution of soundfield technology in classrooms and the significant impact on student learning. Discover how the MARRS Project findings showed improved test scores and cost savings, paving the way for inclusive education practices.

  • Soundfield Technology
  • Classroom Evolution
  • Education Concepts
  • Student Learning
  • MARRS Project

Uploaded on | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ListenPoint ListenPoint Evolution of Soundfield for Classrooms Dave Ellison Ellison Northwest & Listen Technologies

  2. National Diffusion Network founded 1974

  3. National Diffusion Network founded 1974 First Federal program to identify new education concepts

  4. 1978 MARRS Project initiated under NDN

  5. 1978 MARRS Project initiated under NDN Identified that approximately 30% in grades 3-6 have hearing loss failing a 15 dB hearing screening

  6. 1978 MARRS Project initiated under NDN Identified that approximately 30% in grades 3-6 have hearing loss failing a 15 dB hearing screening Study of students with mild or minimal hearing loss to evaluate soundfield as a means to keep them in the mainstream instead of Special Education programs

  7. 1978 MARRS Project initiated under NDN Identified that approximately 30% in grades 3-6 have hearing loss failing a 15 dB hearing screening Study of students with mild or minimal hearing loss to evaluate soundfield as a means to keep them in the mainstream instead of Special Education programs Divided into groups with and without amplification

  8. MARRS Project Findings:

  9. MARRS Project Findings: Test scores improved 10% - 30% over unamplified rooms!

  10. MARRS Project Findings: Test scores improved 10% - 30% over unamplified rooms! Significant cost savings over special programs

  11. MARRS Project Findings: Test scores improved 10% - 30% over unamplified rooms! Significant cost savings over special programs Eliminates the stigma for students for Special Ed

  12. 1982 next MARRS study

  13. 1982 next MARRS study Found improved scores in spelling tests among 131 children 2nd and 3rd grade with and without hearing loss

  14. 1982 next MARRS study Found improved scores in spelling tests among 131 children 2nd and 3rd grade with and without hearing loss First time a negative was identified students with a minimal hearing loss were viewed by the teacher as impulsive, overactive and having a weak attention span

  15. 1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten

  16. 1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists

  17. 1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists 25 words played recorder at 12 feet from students

  18. 1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists 25 words played recorder at 12 feet from students Normal hearing kids: 91% accuracy in testing

  19. 1983 the Tape Recorder Study in kindergarten HiFi recorder placed on teachers desk playing word lists 25 words played recorder at 12 feet from students Normal hearing kids: 91% accuracy in testing Hearing loss kids: 81% accuracy in testing

  20. Recorder moved to CENTER of room.

  21. Recorder moved to CENTER of room Normal hearing kids increased to 98%

  22. Recorder moved to CENTER of room Normal hearing kids increased to 98% Hearing loss kids increased to 96%!!

  23. Recorder moved to CENTER of room Normal hearing kids increased to 98% Hearing loss kids increased to 96%!! When amplified, both groups tested at 98%

  24. 1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield

  25. 1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but

  26. 1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined

  27. 1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial

  28. 1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial 90% of administrators found the system beneficial

  29. 1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial 90% of administrators found the system beneficial Why? Fewer teacher absences due to fatigue and laryngitis

  30. 1986 40 classrooms in Midwest studied for Soundfield Across the board grades improved but This time teachers and administrators were examined 85-90% of teachers found the system beneficial 90% of administrators found the system beneficial Why? Fewer teacher absences due to fatigue and laryngitis Overall improved student test scores

  31. 1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied

  32. 1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs

  33. 1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day

  34. 1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day 75% of primary-level LD students had a measurable hearing loss

  35. 1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day 75% of primary-level LD students had a measurable hearing loss Children with developmental disabilities in primary school made significantly fewer errors in word identification in soundfield

  36. 1990 60 additional classrooms with soundfield studied 40% reduction in students sent to LD programs More detailed hearing screening found 43% of students had some level of hearing loss on any given day 75% of primary-level LD students had a measurable hearing loss Children with developmental disabilities in primary school made significantly fewer errors in word identification in soundfield Overall, children were observed to be more relaxed and responded more quickly in the amplified classroom environment

  37. 1993 children in 12 classrooms were identified with ongoing hearing loss and chronic ear problems

  38. 1993 children in 12 classrooms were identified with ongoing hearing loss and chronic ear problems Teachers, unaware of the target students, completed Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk in Secondary Student (SIFTER) forms for 6 rooms amplified and 6 rooms not amplified

  39. 1993 children in 12 classrooms were identified with ongoing hearing loss and chronic ear problems Teachers, unaware of the target students, completed Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk in Secondary Student (SIFTER) forms for 6 rooms amplified and 6 rooms not amplified SIFTER screening identified 30% of students with a hearing loss based solely on the SIFTER forms further confirming results

  40. 1994 ESL students studied in amplified vs non-amplified

  41. 1994 ESL students studied in amplified vs non-amplified ESL students experienced significant difficulty in non-amplified classrooms in understanding spoken English

  42. 1994 ESL students studied in amplified vs non-amplified ESL students experienced significant difficulty in non-amplified classrooms in understanding spoken English Significant improvement in understanding spoken English when the students were placed in an amplified classroom

  43. 1994 ESL students studied in amplified vs non-amplified ESL students experienced significant difficulty in non-amplified classrooms in understanding spoken English Significant improvement in understanding spoken English when the students were placed in an amplified classroom MARRS project ended in 1995 when funding was cut off to NDN

  44. 2001 No Child Left Behind Act soundfield goes mainstream picks up where MARRS left off

  45. 2001 No Child Left Behind Act soundfield goes mainstream picks up where MARRS left off Mass deployment of inexpensive but somewhat limited products flooded schools to realize the benefits of soundfield

  46. 2001 No Child Left Behind Act soundfield goes mainstream picks up where MARRS left off Mass deployment of inexpensive but somewhat limited products flooded schools to realize the benefits of soundfield To learn more about Listenpoint please visit my booth today

  47. System Structure

  48. Assistive Listening Systems For the Hearing Impaired Americans With Disabilities Act Title III

  49. ADA Title III Eliminates physical barriers to accessibility

  50. ADA Title III Eliminates physical barriers to accessibility Includes wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking stalls, door widths, counter heights all barriers to accessibility

Related


More Related Content