Exploring Therapists' Perspectives on Psychological Case Formulation

Therapists perspectives on using case formulation Dawn Leeming; Jo Brooks; Viv Burr; Mike Lucock University of Huddersfield, UK

Psychological case formulation Using generic psychological theory to develop interlinked hypotheses about difficulties experienced by individuals, in order to guide intervention

An increasingly valued therapeutic practice Now used by range of MH professionals, across range of therapeutic approaches Alternative to psychiatric diagnosis Focus on formulation skills in therapy training Growth in use of generic off-the-shelf templates (alongside individualised, multi- model, integrative formulations)

Evaluating formulations Can we conceive of accuracy or reliability of formulations? Butler (2006): May be more appropriate to consider usefulness

A relatively under-researched therapeutic practice the lack of a service user perspective [on formulation] is a major gap in the literature, as is an understanding of the process by which clinicians draw up formulations (Johnstone et al., 2011)

Aim of current study To explore therapists reports of their practices in relation to formulation and their views on the usefulness of formulation for themselves and clients

Methods On-line survey of psychological therapists working in public sector mental health services Mostly open-ended questions: Nature of formulation Practices Benefits / challenges for self/clients Thematic analysis

Preliminary analyses of data from 13 therapists 3 trainees, 10 qualified therapists Nursing, clinical psychology, psychiatry, counselling A range of theoretical influences CBT & CAT slightly more common than others

Key preliminary findings Formulation valued highly particularly for enabling understanding Variation in practices can be varied experience for clients? Formulation viewed as powerful potential to be challenging need for protection , care & compassion when formulating

Perceived value of formulation Facilitating understanding It is essential. Without it there is no psychological understanding.

An understanding that is: Collaborative Values theory Individualised / bespoke Useful & meaningful to both Holistic, comprehensive & contextualised Tentative

Facilitating understanding Firstly that it is meaningful, clear and understandable to the client. It should hopefully help a client to understand where they might be able to work together with the therapist to make some changes. It would hopefully draw on the different aspects of a person's life which are linked to the problem, such as past experiences, unhelpful behaviours, protective factors, and so on. I think a good formulation should aim to help move a person on in their own insight and understanding of their issues. a collaborative process of building a greater understanding. The client brings their expertise with respect to their life and difficulties, I hope I can bring a theoretical framework that helps to contain, explain and ultimately allow for improvement of those same difficulties.

Differences in approaches & views: Differing approaches to collaboration Differing ideas about the relevance and role of psychiatric diagnostic concepts to formulations

Differing accounts of collaboration: Theory led vs. client led I am mostly assessing the extent of the client's experiential avoidance. I ask how others perceive their difficulties or what they are prevented from doing by the problem (Nurse, 3rd wave CBT) I tend to follow the client s lead and assume that they will bring the relevant material into the session, then explore the information provided (Clin Psych, CAT) Observing expert vs. facilitator I invite the client to share her historical experiences and describe examples of her current problems . I encourage the client to identify any links between current thoughts/ behaviours and her history (Nurse, CBT) Observing the way the client presents in the room i.e. the way they relate to me, the way they talk about themselves, the way they experience/ relate to emotions (Clin Psych, CAT.

How formulations are represented & shared Total Method Me Client Both of us Varies Responses Standardised template 4 1 1 2 0 8 Draw diagram 2 0 5 1 CAT reformulation letter Another kind of letter Written summary Oral explanation / discussion 5 2 0 3 0 7 4 0 3 0 5 4 0 1 0 10 1 0 8 1 2 Other 1 0 1 0

Conclusions Formulation was highly valued by this small self-selected sample of therapists (though with some caution) Formulation incorporates a range of practices Research could usefully explore the impact of these for clients in a range of settings