Rules of the GA - General Assembly Procedures

Rules of the GA - General Assembly Procedures
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This document outlines the rules and procedures governing the General Assembly (GA), including roles of the Chair, minutes, discussions, motions, and ad hoc motions. It covers key aspects such as speech rights, time limits, voting procedures, and amendment processes to ensure orderly conduct during meetings.

  • General Assembly
  • Rules
  • Procedures
  • Governance
  • Meeting

Uploaded on Mar 18, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. @tonyR_H Open Peer Review RESEARCHER ATTITUDES & NEXT STEPS ASAPbio/HHMI/Wellcome peer review meeting 8 Feb 2018 Tony Ross-Hellauer www.know-center.at

  2. Open Peer Review encompasses diverse constellations of many distinct aspects ** 122 definitions collected and analysed ** ** 22 distinct configurations of 7 traits identified ** Open identities Open reports Open participation Primary aspects Open interaction Open pre-review manuscripts Open final-version commenting Open platforms Secondary aspects Image CC BY AC McCann, w/ amendment (by me) See: Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review", F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2) Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018

  3. Survey on attitudes to OPR Online survey for OpenAIRE project Open Sept Oct 2016 3062 complete responses from authors, reviewers and editors Available: Ross-Hellauer T, Deppe A, Schmidt B (2017) Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0189311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311 Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018

  4. Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018

  5. Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018

  6. Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018

  7. Views by age group Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018 7

  8. Views on OPR by scientific discipline Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018 8

  9. ATTITUDES TO OPEN PEER REVIEW OPR is already mainstream 76.2% have practical experience 60% believe OPR should be common practice Positive reactions to most OPR traits (esp. open interaction, reports, participation) However, pronounced rejection of open identities (51% against) Generational differences younger researchers more supportive Diverse disciplinary differences need to be better understood Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018 9

  10. More research what works, in which circumstances? OPR is a very complex issue what should be made open, in which circumstances, at what stage, to whom? The large number of possible configurations of options presents a tool-kit for differing communities to construct open peer review systems that reflect their own needs, preferences and goals. (Ross-Hellauer, 2017) We need more evidence [T]here is often little evidence to support or refute claims [regarding OPR] (Ross- Hellauer, 2017) The way ahead Open up the data! Multi-stakeholder agreement on definitions and priorities for research Cross-publisher/-journal studies on what works and what doesn t Upcoming workshop organised by OpenUP project 27 March, London Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2017 Know-Center GmbH Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 2018 10

  11. Thanks! Email: tross@know-center.at Twitter: @tonyR_H Many thanks to my co-authors on the survey Birgit Schmidt & Arvid Deppe This work was funded by the European Commission H2020 project OpenAIRE2020 (Grant agreement: 643410, Call: H2020- EINFRA-2014-1). 11

More Related Content