Understanding Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Principles

Understanding Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Principles
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Revealing the intricacies of NMR spectroscopy, explore the regions in the 1H NMR spectrum, understand local-field contributions, integrated intensity of peaks, and spin-spin splitting rules. Delve into the N+1 rule, coupling constants, and learn the significance of non-equivalent nuclei interactions. Unravel the complex relationship between protons for a deeper insight into molecular structures.

  • NMR spectroscopy
  • Proton interactions
  • Spin-spin splitting
  • Coupling constants
  • Molecular structure

Uploaded on Apr 19, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Pilot LPV/r M03-613 LPV/r Mono KalMo OK OK04 KALESOLO MOST HIV-NAT 077

  2. KALESOLO Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W48 N = 99 Continuation current triple antiretroviral therapy (CART) HIV+ 18 years On stable cART > 3 months No history of prior virologic failure on PI HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL > 6 months N = 87 LPV/r 400/100 mg bid * Randomisation was stratified by centre, and ongoing treatment (LPV/r, PI other than LPV/r, NNRTI) Objective Non inferiority of the monotherapy group in the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 without modification of treatment (per-protocol analysis) ; lower limit of two-sided 90% CI for the difference = - 12%, 80% power Patients lost to follow-up or with no HIV-1 RNA value at W48 were considered as failures (missing = failure) KALESOLO Meynard JL, JAC 2010;65:2436-44

  3. KALESOLO Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Baseline characteristics and patient disposition Continuation of cART N = 99 43 24% 28% 525 96% 15.7 LPV/r monotherapy N = 87 44 28% 25% 494 94% 28.6 Median age, years Female CDC stage C CD4 cell count, median/mm3 HIV-RNA < 50 c/mL ARV at inclusion 3TC/FTC ZDV TDF ABC ddI 78% 38% 33% 21% 15% 80% 41% 25% 21% 16% 25% 29% NNRTI 33% ; 41% 9 32% ; 39% 10 (6 re-intensified) PI: LPV/r ; other PI Discontinuation by W48, n Meynard JL, JAC 2010;65:2436-44 KALESOLO

  4. KALESOLO Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Virologic outcome at W48 HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL with re-intensification allowed Therapeutic failure % 91 88 100 88 cART N = 12 LPV/mono N = 14 84 75 HIV-1 RNA > 50 c/mL 0 5 HIV-1 RNA measure missing 50 5 0 Change of ARV For virologic failure For adverse event 7 0 3 10 8 1 25 N= 99 87 99 87 0 95% CI 95% CI for the difference = - 12.4 ; 4.5 for the difference = - 4.5 ; 10.4 Continue cART LPV/r mono Non inferiority of LPV/r monotherapy not demonstrated Meynard JL, JAC 2010;65:2436-44 KALESOLO

  5. KALESOLO Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Other outcomes Multivariate analysis: treatment failure was not associated with adherence to therapy but was associated with older age at baseline Of samples with HIV-1 RNA > 50 c/mL, 20 genotypes from 14 patients (all in the LPV/r monotherapy group) could be analysed: 1 patient developed major PI resistance mutation, no patient developed mutations conferring resistance to LPV/r For lipids, fasting total cholesterol changes were significantly higher in the LPV/r monotherapy group (+ 0.42 mmol/L vs + 0.08 mmol/L ; p = 0.04) None of the 12 serious adverse events were drug-related Grade 3 to 4 laboratory abnormalities occurred in 3 patients in each group Diarrhoea was more frequent in the LPV/r monotherapy group (N = 34 vs N = 13 ; p < 0.001) Meynard JL, JAC 2010;65:2436-44 KALESOLO

  6. KALESOLO Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Conclusions In patients with virologic suppression, by per-protocol analysis, LPV/r monotherapy did not achieve non inferiority versus continuation of current antiretroviral regimen for maintaining HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL The incidence of virologic failure was low and successfully managed by treatment reintensification Meynard JL, JAC 2010;65:2436-44 KALESOLO

More Related Content