Network Milestones and Work Remaining Overview

steering committee meeting february 20 2020 n.w
1 / 27
Embed
Share

Explore the accomplishments and remaining work for seven network milestones and workgroups, with a focus on clinical annotation and penetrance analysis. Learn about the significant data findings in disease areas and the upcoming projects for continued success in eMERGE III.

  • Network
  • Milestones
  • Clinical Annotation
  • Penetrance Analysis
  • Remaining Work

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING February 20, 2020 Toll-Free: 1-866-901-6455 Long Distance: 1-562-247-8421 Access Code: 888-196-492 https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5392020819915708941 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 February 2020 Final deliverables

  2. Final Deliverables Discussion Describe accomplishments and work remaining for each of the seven network milestones and workgroups Identify timelines and groups associated with remaining work Outline plan for remaining time in eMERGE III and close out call June 4th, 2020 from 2:00-5:00 pm EST. 1 February 2020 Final deliverables

  3. Milestone 1: Clinical Annotation Conduct penetrance analysis in conditions with sufficient data and assess impact on clinical outcomes; describe lessons learned. Positive Subjects Forms Collected Accomplishments: Developed outcomes forms for 10 disease areas Data was insufficient for 4 disease areas Analyses were performed for 6 disease areas with sufficient data including arrhythmias, aortic disease, cardiomyopathy, FH, breast cancer and colon cancer Sufficient Data Arrhythmias 172 73 Aortic Dilation/ Aortopathy Familial Hypercholesterolemia 34 28 203 113 Breast Cancer 397 137 Cardiomyopathy 239 114 Colorectal Cancer Insufficient Data 235 206 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 4 2 Chronic Kidney Disease 14 13 Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency Tuberous Sclerosis 1 7 16 1 2 February 2020 Final deliverables

  4. Milestone 1: Clinical Annotation Conduct penetrance analysis in conditions with sufficient data and assess impact on clinical outcomes; describe lessons learned. Remaining work: Arrhythmias (Dan Roden): Project 1: Code-based > stand-alone paper Project 2: ECG based (need QT intervals from network before end of March) > may combine with Project 1 publication Project 3: Brugada syndrome FH (Iftikhar Kullo): Profile in large cohort (public health perspective; combined penetrance, risk): MCS circulated Request for each site to get additional data (or minor clarification) on 120 genotype+ subjects Breast cancer (Wendy Chung): Redoing analysis with indications for referrals. Need outstanding forms completed from sites Aortopathy (Iftikhar Kullo): Will give guidance for metrics needed to calculate z scores 3 February 2020 Final deliverables

  5. Milestone 1: Clinical Annotation Penetrance Lessons learned How do we study penetrance? In people not ascertained by phenotype or genotype. How people were ascertained was not straightforward, e.g. in cardiology clinic the ascertainment may or may not have been relevant to lipids In a large enough sample size (E3 OK for BRCA1/2, LDLR/APOB, Arrhythmia). Penetrance would require a lot of data for rare disorders or risk alleles (OR in larger dataset easier). Conflation of pathogenicity classification vs. penetrance (also, are LPs true Ps?) Need specific outcomes forms (some of which can be completed by participants) or records (such as ECG) and detailed age of onset or screening data. Forms need to be tested and time to review charts must be supported This represents an iterative process, in that, while testing is important to make sure the forms work to collect data, we ve had several instances where the data collected based on the initial form construction has some deficiencies or gaps that led to requests for second review. This should be accounted for. In some cases where clinical diagnosis may not be made despite presence of disease, further phenotyping was needed (tuberous sclerosis, NF2) for both variant classification and penetrance assessment. 4 February 2020 Final deliverables

  6. Milestone 2: Outcomes accomplishments Determine the impact of return of genetic results (RoR) on patients immediate outcomes, 6 months and when available 12 months after RoR in conditions with sufficient data. 15 outcomes forms developed, and data harmonized Two data freezes for interim analysis disseminated to Network Data entry issues identified, abstraction guides developed Additional data needed for final assessment identified 6-month outcomes assessment in final stages, final data freeze in March for remaining data issues. 5 February 2020 Final deliverables

  7. Milestone 2: Outcomes remaining work Determine the impact of return of genetic results (RoR) on patients immediate outcomes, 6 months and when available 12 months after RoR in conditions with sufficient data. Complete final six-month analysis Needs: Data freeze three (March 18th, 2020) Prepare and submit Outcomes manuscripts (on going) NT296 Peterson et al. Collection and analysis of large-scale outcome measures following targeted next generation sequencing Needs: ICD & CPT data refresh Complete 12-month outcomes data entry Focus on high impact phenotypes Needs: Data freeze three (March 18th, 2020) 6 February 2020 Final deliverables

  8. Milestone 2: RoR Determine the impact of return of genetic results (RoR) on participants immediate outcomes, 6 months and when available 12 months after RoR in conditions with sufficient data. Accomplishments: Participant surveys (Participant survey subgroup of RoR) Coordinated across sites at baseline (decisional conflict only) and 1- and 6-12-months post-disclosure Data dictionaries reconciled for most questions (Wynn & Milo Rasouly), data being placed in one REDCap database at CC. NT373: Psychologic impact on participants of receiving positive genomic results in eMERGE III work in progress. NT363: Participants perceived clinical and personal utility of receiving positive genomic results in eMERGE III to follow NT373. 7 February 2020 Final deliverables

  9. Milestone 2: RoR Determine the impact of return of genetic results (RoR) on participants immediate outcomes, 6 months and when available 12 months after RoR in conditions with sufficient data. Remaining work: Participant surveys (Participant survey subgroup of RoR) Finish reconciling data dictionaries, data being placed in one REDCap database at CC. (4/1/2020) NT373: Psychologic impact on participants of receiving positive genomic results in eMERGE III finish analysis and manuscript. (6/1/2020) NT363: Participants perceived clinical and personal utility of receiving positive genomic results in eMERGE III analysis and manuscript. (7/1/2020) 8 February 2020 Final deliverables

  10. Milestone 3: EHRI Improve and/or standardize genomic clinical decision support (CDS) for return of clinically relevant genetic or incidental results directly to physicians. Accomplishments: Proved it is feasible to establish a structured clinical genetic result delivery network that linking heterogenous organizations in a manner that enabled CDS Developed eMERGE XML result transfer format and open sourced via GitHub Published how the network was created to provide a basis for other efforts (Aronson S et al., JAMIA 2018) Developed draft FHIR genetic result specification and documentation Maintained a culture of open collaboration where all sites shared lessons learned relative to ROR and CDS infrastructure Site infrastructure presentations Numerous surveys Development and rollout milestone tracking through the project Structured results in the EHR or Ancillary OMICs system? 8 7 Both 6 5 Anc 4 3 EHR None 2 1 0 9 February 2020 Final deliverables

  11. Milestone 3: EHRI Improve and/or standardize genomic clinical decision support (CDS) for return of clinically relevant genetic or incidental results directly to physicians. Remaining work: Submit EHRI subgroup manuscripts (June 2020) NT213 Rasmussen L et al. Infobutton genomic medicine initiatives survey NT319 Watkins N et al. Use of Infobuttons to find answers to clinician s questions in clinical genomics Submit case series and editorial on genomic medicine implementation manuscript (June 2020) NT352 Multiple Submissions - Case series and editorial on genomic medicine implementation Two pilot implementations of eMERGE FHIR genetics spec (June 2020) 10 February 2020 Final deliverables

  12. Milestone 4: Phenotyping Goals 1. Manage 25 e III Phenotype Development & Implementation 2. Leverage NLP to improve phenotyping for five conditions Accomplishments to date e III phenotypes 25 (100%) developed; 25 (100%) validated 23 (92%) Completed; 20 released to the public 2 shared with the AoU project: breast cancer & T2DM Natural Language Processing Long QT- Arrhythmias released to the network DQC Guideline (to avoid inconsistent/incomplete data) Data Standardization Efforts OMOP CDM for both structured and unstructured clinical data Phecode 1.2 beta released and paper accepted by JMIR Online community PheWAS Dataset Publication Nine (9/20) included in the JBI special issue on deep phenotyping Mapping ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM Codes to Phecodes: Workflow Development and Initial Evaluation, Wu P, et. al., JMIR Med Inform 2019;7(4):e14325 Association of Genetic Risk of Obesity with Postoperative Complications Using Mendelian Randomization, JR Robinson, et. al., World journal of surgery 44 (1), 84-94 25 Total e III phenotypes: As of 02/20 25 25 25 25 23 20 20 15 10 5 0 Algorithms Developed Validated Implemented Completed Released for Public 5 NLP algorithms: as of 02/20 5 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 0 Algorithms Developed Validated Implemented Completed 11 February 2020 Final deliverables

  13. Milestone 4: Phenotyping Leveraging Natural Language Processing to Improve Phenotyping Remaining Work Non-NLP Implement the remaining two algorithms by 02/29 NLP Collect and share preparatory guidelines for NLP implementation by 02/29 Release NLP phenotypes (i.e., CRS, ACO, FH, Lupus) by 03/31 Implement five NLP phenotypes by 05/31 Submit NLP-based eIII lessons learned manuscripts by 06/30 12 February 2020 Final deliverables

  14. Milestone 5: RoR Explore the challenges involved in identifying at-risk family members and informing them of their potential risk. Accomplishments: Participant surveys (Participant survey subgroup of RoR): Familial sharing questions NT349: Family communication following return of positive results (Wynn & Milo Rasouly, data analysis in progress) HCP R01 Questions on familial implications on surveys (data collection almost complete) and interviews (in progress) 13 February 2020 Final deliverables

  15. Milestone 5: RoR Explore the challenges involved in identifying at-risk family members and informing them of their potential risk. Remaining work: Participant surveys (Participant survey subgroup of RoR): NT349: Family communication following return of positive results finish data analysis and manuscript.(6/1/2020) HCP R01 (ends 4/1/2021) Complete survey data collection (3/1/2020) Complete conducting interviews (6/1/20200) Concept sheets development (9/1/2020) Manuscripts submitted (3/1/2021) 14 February 2020 Final deliverables

  16. Milestone 6: RoR & Outcomes Estimate the institutional impact of RoR. Accomplishments: RoR Study on the impact on IRBs (completed): Ethical Considerations Related to Return of Results from Genomic Medicine Projects: The eMERGE Network (Phase III) Experience. Fossey et. al., J Pers Med. 2018 NT273: Returning genomic results to eMERGE participants: The who, what, where, and how of disclosure (Weisner, submitted for publication) NT322: The Reckoning: What We Found After Return of Results for 25,000 eMERGE3 participants (Leppig, data collected, writing in progress) NT277: Operationalizing participant choices about genomic results: Beyond all or none ACMG recommended genes (Hoell & Prows, writing in progress) NT300: Understanding the return of results process: Content review of patient summary letters (Lynch & Williams J , writing in progress) NT323: Challenges in Returning Results in the eMERGE consortium (Halverson and Clayton, writing in progress) NT332: Network-wide lessons learned from the reporting of negative test results (Sharp & Smith, data collection in progress) NT340: Practical and Logistical Challenges Related to Return of Genomic Results in Phase III of the eMERGE Network Lessons Learned (Kochan & Kullo, data collection in progress) 15 February 2020 Final deliverables

  17. Milestone 6: RoR & Outcomes Estimate the institutional impact of RoR. Remaining work: RoR: Complete manuscript and submit NT322: The Reckoning: What We Found After Return of Results for 25,000 eMERGE3 participants finish data analysis and manuscript. (5/1/2020) NT277: Operationalizing participant choices about genomic results: Beyond all or none ACMG recommended genes finish manuscript.(3/2/2020) NT300: Understanding the return of results process: Content review of patient summary letters finish manuscript.(4/15/2020) NT323: Challenges in Returning Results in the eMERGE consortium finish manuscript.(5/1/2020) NT332: Network-wide lessons learned from the reporting of negative test results finish data analysis and manuscript.(6/1/2020) NT340: Practical and Logistical Challenges Related to Return of Genomic Results in Phase III of the eMERGE Network Lessons Learned finish data analysis and manuscript. (6/1/2020) Outcomes: Comprehensively examine test ordering after RoR to assess economic impact (June 2020) NT296 Peterson et al. Collection and analysis of large-scale outcome measures following targeted next generation sequencing 16 February 2020 Final deliverables

  18. Disseminate lessons learned on the various aspects of genomic medicine implementation. Milestone 7: Accomplishments Accomplishments: Published Lessons Learned Manuscripts Harmonizing clinical sequencing and interpretation for the eMERGE-3 Network (The eMERGE Consortium, AJHG, 2019) Parental attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: a multi-site experimental survey (Antommaria et al., AJOB Empir Bioeth., 2018) Ethical considerations related to return of results from genomic medicine projects: the eMERGE Network (Phase III) experience (Fossey et al., J Pers Med, 2018) Harmonizing outcomes for genomic medicine: comparison of eMERGE outcomes to ClinGen outcome/intervention pairs (Williams et al., Healthcare (Basel), 2018) Healthcare provider education to support integration of pharmacogenomics in practice: the eMERGE Network experience (Rohrer Vitek et al., Pharmacogenomics, 2017). Pharmacogenomic clinical decision support design and multi-site process outcomes analysis in the eMERGE Network (Herr et al., J Am Med Inform Assoc., 2019). OMOP Information Model for Phenotyping (Hripcsak et al., J Biomed Inform., 2019)* Detecting time-evolving phenotype topics via tensor-factorization on EHRs: Cardiovascular disease case study (Zhao et al., J Biomed Informatics, 2019; site specific publication)* Empowering genomic medicine by establishing critical sequencing result data flows: the eMERGE example (Aronson et al., J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2018). Genomic information for clinicians in the EHR: Lessons learned from ClinGen and eMERGE (Williams et al. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019) Lessons Learned: 10 published, 11 in development MCS 10 8 Number publications 6 4 2 0 Clinical Annotation EHRI Genomics Outcomes PGx Phenotyping ROR Published In development *A subset of the lessons learned publications are also being included in a special issue on Phenotyping Methodology in the Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 17 February 2020 Final deliverables

  19. Milestone 7: Remaining work Disseminate lessons learned on the various aspects of genomic medicine implementation (Network & CC). Remaining work: Publish NT357 Lessons from the eMERGE Network: Balancing genomics in discovery and in practice. Targeted submission early March 2020. Update website with final lessons learn summaries and publications. Targeted update March 2020. Support publication process of workgroup lessons learned papers. Full support through June 2020, ongoing tracking of remaining lessons learned publications. 18 February 2020 Final deliverables

  20. Other accomplishments: PGx Accomplishments: Tracked PGx return during e3 Established relationship with CPIC, shared lessons learned at in-person meeting and learned what they most wanted from this consortium (to generate additional association information to be used in guideline statements) Explored potential collaborations with IGNITE Examined feasibility of additional e3 PGx outcomes or SPHINX PGx projects Contributed lessons learned in concert with other working groups (ROR, EHRI) Publications 19 February 2020 Final deliverables

  21. Other remaining work: PGx Remaining work: Publications in process Star allele PGx nomenclature (NT335) Provide guidance for any PGx work in e4 Early prioritization of complicated PGx phenotypes (with subphenotypes for patient and practioner CDS interaction, if applicable) Consider limitations of current guidelines in non-white populations Be cautious about assuming any easy reuse of existing CDS 20 February 2020 Final deliverables

  22. Other accomplishments: Genomics Accomplishments: Manuscript detailing the genotyping and imputation of ~84,000 eMERGE subjects has been published (Stanaway et al; Genetic Epidemiology, 2019). Provided guidance to the eMERGE CC regarding genetic data activities in order to produce four large multiple use discovery-based datasets Co-chair Sleinman led supplement-funded efforts to link Geocoding data to eMERGE participants. Establish focus groups for SPHINX PheWAS data integration, used focus group data to generate and integrate pilot PheWAS data Assist VUMC with implementation of alternate methods of assessing penetrance and risk-scores using network wide data Survey sites for availability and release of eMERGE II/III array data for SV/CNV calling 21 February 2020 Final deliverables

  23. Other remaining work: Genomics Accomplishments: Conduct SV/CNV calling for available array data and determine funding needs for future data analysis Conducted on Phase I data Examining funding opportunities for data transfer and analysis of Phase II and III array data Conduct PheWAS on Structural Variant/Copy Number Variant datasets MCS NT314 Stanaway et al. The Development of an Imputed Structural Variant Genomic Dataset and Association to Neurological and Alcohol Use Disorder Electronic Medical Record Phenotypes with Biobank Scale Subject Ascertainment Completed, manuscript in preparation. 22 February 2020 Final deliverables

  24. Pediatric accomplishments Describe the opportunities and challenges for pediatric sites in eMERGE III Accomplishments: Collection of outcomes data at pediatric sites similar issues to adult sites Collection of participant survey data - parents, adolescent participants (13y 17y) and participants 18y and older Cascade screening surveys (CCHMC) and interviews (CHOP) of parents regarding testing of parents and siblings Approaches established at pediatric sites for return of adult-onset only conditions 23 February 2020 Final deliverables

  25. Pediatric other remaining work Describe the opportunities and challenges for pediatric sites in eMERGE III Remaining work: Develop manuscript on pediatric (CCHMC, CHOP) results small N so present cases Includes cascade testing robust data collected regarding testing of parents and siblings Includes discussion of data custody when participant turns 18 years particular issue for reclassified variants Includes outcomes data Address challenges integrating data from pediatric sites with adult sites: Reconciling participant survey data since person completing the survey is the parent for the most part and not the participant NT300 approach to adult-onset only conditions at the pediatric sites (CCHMC, CHOP) and in the BabySeq project (BCH) 24 February 2020 Final deliverables

  26. June Webinar & Closeout Final call in June to review progress on the remaining work June 4, 2020 from 2:00-5:00 pm EST Generalized Network support (workgroup calls, coordination) will continue through June of 2020 CC will support individual needs on a case by case basis after that time Investigators should continue to update publication tracker 25 February 2020 Final deliverables

  27. Network-wide milestones 1. Expand the understanding of penetrance by describing the lessons learned from eMERGE, for example the sample size and age at onset required for penetrance analysis. Conduct penetrance analysis in conditions with sufficient data in the eMERGE cohort to assess impact on clinical outcomes 2. Determine the impact of return of genetic results (RoR) on patients immediate outcomes, 6 months and when available 12 months after RoR for variants with sufficient prevalence and data, which includes identifying Modification of clinical care (such as changes in prescriptions, lab tests ordered, etc.) and Outcomes related to processes of care, clinical utility, family utility, provider utility, and patients psychosocial factors. 3. Improve and/or standardize genomic clinical decision support (CDS) for return of clinically relevant genetic or incidental results directly to physicians, including initial assessment of impact on relevant process outcomes. 4. Develop a natural language processing (NLP) component for a maximum of five high-priority phenotypes, agreed upon by the phenotyping WG, the Steering Committee and NHGRI. 5. Explore the challenges involved in identifying at-risk family members and informing them of their potential risk as well as collect the responses of the family members. 6. Estimate the institutional impact of RoR 7. Disseminate lessons learned on the various aspects of genomic medicine implementation by activities such as publishing articles that propose the key elements for effectively returning genomic results to providers and patients and comparing the impact different methods of RoR have on patient and physician care across all sites. 26 February 2020 Final deliverables

More Related Content